The Application of 3D fluid recovery attenuation inversion isotropic as an alternative image quality improvement information anatomy and Efisiensi inspection time magnetic resonance imaging brain
Corresponding Author(s) : luh deva Wedayanti
International Journal of Allied Medical Sciences and Clinical Research,
Vol. 8 No. 4 (2020): 2020 Volume - 8 Issue-4
Abstract
Volume Isotropic Turbo Spin echo Acquisition (VISTA) is a technique in the Fast Spin Echo (FSE) / Turbo Spin Echo (TSE) sequence with special modifications optimized for 3D Isotropic imaging . The term isotropic means that the voxels produced by three-dimensional (3D) acquisition measure the same thing in every direction. So that the possibility of images can be reformatted with the same resolution in all directions. 3D isotropic is one of the 3D volumetric imaging that has pixel size equal to x, y and z so that it has the same image quality advantage when changing views from axial to sagittal and from sagittal to coronal because from anywhere seen will have pixel size that is same. 3D isotropic data provides evaluation data that has the potential to evaluate the smallest body parts, because given that 2D scans cannot optimally evaluate some complex structures in the head. Objective research is that u ntuk analyze the effect of application of 3D FLAIR isotropic as an alternative to improve the quality of the image, information about anatomy and efficiency of inspection time MRI brain sequences conventional 2D FLAIR. The research is that there is a difference in image quality between the sequence of 2D FLAIR conventional and 3D FLAIR isotropic on examination of the brain . The statistically significant difference in SNR ( Signal to noise Ratio ) with P- Value 0,000 between conventional 2D FLAIR sequences and 3D isotropic FLAIR in the whole MRI brain sample , because the SNR value of conventional 2D FLAIR sequences and isotropic 3D FLAIR p <0.05. Obtained statistically significant difference in CNR ( Contrast to Noise Ratio ) between conventional 2D FLAIR sequences and isotropic 3D FLAIR sequences . In organ gray matter of the pons, the white matter of the pons , the white matter of the cerebellum and pons to the cerebellum better 3D FLAIR isotropic , while the gray matter of the white matter and gray matter of the cerebellum is better to use 2D FLAIR conventional and is obtained difference anatomical information the sequence of 2D FLAIR conventional and 3D FLAIR isotropic examination MRI Brain uses slice axial FLAIR sequences in the sample as a whole and time examination 2D conventional FLAIR more slowly than 3 D FLAIR isotropic with the overall examination time difference of 6 minutes 22 seconds
Keywords
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)BibTeX
-
1. Somasundaram K Kalavathi P. Oriental jurnal Analysis of Imaging Artefacts in MR Brain Images.2012;
2. Hanan SSA, Jan NM. Improving Diagnostic Viewing of Medical Images using Enhancement Algoritms Hanan Saleh S. Ahmed and Md Jan Nordin School of Computer Science, Faculty of Information Science and Technology,. Jcomput Sci.2011;7(12):1831-8
3. Rochmayanti D, Widodo TS, Soesanti I. Analisis Perubahan Parameter Number of Signal Averaged (NSA) Terhadap Peningkatan SNR dan Waktu Pencitraan pada MRI. Jnteti.2013;2(4):37;45
4. Westbrook C, Carolyne, K Roth dan Talbot, J, 2011, MRI in Practice, Frourth Edition. Blackwell Science Ltd., United Kongdom
5. Bitar, Richard, General Leung, Richard Perng, Sameh Tadros, Alan R. Moddy, Josee Sarrazin, Caitlin McGregor, Monique Christakis, Sean Symons, Andrew Nelson dan Timothy P. Roberts, 2006, MR Pulse Sequences : What Every Radiologist Wants to Know but Is Afraid to Ask, RSNA Volume 26, Number 2
6. Pada S, Mri P, Lumbal V, Sagital P, Fse T, dengan P, et. Al. UpayaMempersingkat Scan Time Menggunakan Grappa dan Perubahan Nilai Parameter MRI. 2017;(November): 534-41
7. Nesseth 2000, Prosedures and Dokumentation for CT and MRI. Kansas:Me Graw Hill Medical Publishing Division.
8. Westbrook C, Carolyne, K Roth dan Talbot, J, 2014, Handbook of MRI tecnigue, Fourth Edition. Blackwell Science Ltd., United Kingdom
9. M. Bianchi, et. Al, 2016, Effectiveness of 3D T2- weighted FLAIR FSE Sequences with Fat Suppression for Detection of Brain MR Imaging Signal Changes in Children., American Society of Neuroradiology
10. Lawrence Yao et. Al, 2006, Isotropic 3D Fast Spin-Echo with Proton-Density-Like Contrast: A Comprehensive Approach to Musculoskeletal MRI., American Roentgen Ray Society.
11. Edelstein WA, Mahesh M, Carrino JA. MRI: Time is dose- And money and versatility. J Am Coll Radiol [Internet].2010;7(8):650-2. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2010.05.002
12. Pearce, Evelyn C. 2006 Anatomi dan Fisiologi untuk Paramedis. Jakarta: Gramedia
13. Syarifuddin, 2010. Anatomi Fisiologi Untuk Mahasiswa Keperawatan. Jakarta:EGC
14. Sherwood, Lauralee, 2011. Fisiologi Manusia. Ijakarta.EGC
15. Saladin, 2017. Anatomy dan Physiology. USA : McGraw-Hill Inc
16. Notosiswoyo, dkk.2004. Pemanfaatan Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) sebagai Sarana Diagnosa Pasien, media Litbang Kesehatan Volume XIV Nomor 3 Tahun 2004. Jakarta
17. Hashemi, H Ray and Bladley, G. William,2010, MRI : The Basic third edition, Williams & Wilkins, USA
18. Rottmar M, Haralampieva D, Salemi S. Magnetization Transfer MR Imaging to Monitor Muscle Tissue Formation during Myogenic in Vivo Differentiation of Muscle Precursor Cells. Radiology. 2016;281(2):436-443.doi:10.1148/Radiol.2016152330
19. Westbrook, Catherine, 2014, Handbook of MRI Technigue, Fourth Edition, Blackwell Science LTd., United Kingdom
20. Foramen K. MRI at aGlade, 2nd Ed. By Catherine Westbrook. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 136 Pp.,2010. Softcover (ISBN: 978-1405192552).Vol 196,;2011.doi:2214/AJR.106192
21. Ali Naragi, M. White Lawrence. 2012. Tree-Dimensional MRI of the Musculoskeletal System. Joint Department of Medical Imaging, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto American Roentgen Ray Soclety. DOI:10.2214/AJR.12.9099
22. Ristow Oliver et. Al, 2009, Isotropic 3D fast spin-echo imaging versus standard 2D imaging at 3.0 T of the knee—image quality and diagnostic performance., University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA., DOI 10.1007/s00330-008-1260-y
References
2. Hanan SSA, Jan NM. Improving Diagnostic Viewing of Medical Images using Enhancement Algoritms Hanan Saleh S. Ahmed and Md Jan Nordin School of Computer Science, Faculty of Information Science and Technology,. Jcomput Sci.2011;7(12):1831-8
3. Rochmayanti D, Widodo TS, Soesanti I. Analisis Perubahan Parameter Number of Signal Averaged (NSA) Terhadap Peningkatan SNR dan Waktu Pencitraan pada MRI. Jnteti.2013;2(4):37;45
4. Westbrook C, Carolyne, K Roth dan Talbot, J, 2011, MRI in Practice, Frourth Edition. Blackwell Science Ltd., United Kongdom
5. Bitar, Richard, General Leung, Richard Perng, Sameh Tadros, Alan R. Moddy, Josee Sarrazin, Caitlin McGregor, Monique Christakis, Sean Symons, Andrew Nelson dan Timothy P. Roberts, 2006, MR Pulse Sequences : What Every Radiologist Wants to Know but Is Afraid to Ask, RSNA Volume 26, Number 2
6. Pada S, Mri P, Lumbal V, Sagital P, Fse T, dengan P, et. Al. UpayaMempersingkat Scan Time Menggunakan Grappa dan Perubahan Nilai Parameter MRI. 2017;(November): 534-41
7. Nesseth 2000, Prosedures and Dokumentation for CT and MRI. Kansas:Me Graw Hill Medical Publishing Division.
8. Westbrook C, Carolyne, K Roth dan Talbot, J, 2014, Handbook of MRI tecnigue, Fourth Edition. Blackwell Science Ltd., United Kingdom
9. M. Bianchi, et. Al, 2016, Effectiveness of 3D T2- weighted FLAIR FSE Sequences with Fat Suppression for Detection of Brain MR Imaging Signal Changes in Children., American Society of Neuroradiology
10. Lawrence Yao et. Al, 2006, Isotropic 3D Fast Spin-Echo with Proton-Density-Like Contrast: A Comprehensive Approach to Musculoskeletal MRI., American Roentgen Ray Society.
11. Edelstein WA, Mahesh M, Carrino JA. MRI: Time is dose- And money and versatility. J Am Coll Radiol [Internet].2010;7(8):650-2. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2010.05.002
12. Pearce, Evelyn C. 2006 Anatomi dan Fisiologi untuk Paramedis. Jakarta: Gramedia
13. Syarifuddin, 2010. Anatomi Fisiologi Untuk Mahasiswa Keperawatan. Jakarta:EGC
14. Sherwood, Lauralee, 2011. Fisiologi Manusia. Ijakarta.EGC
15. Saladin, 2017. Anatomy dan Physiology. USA : McGraw-Hill Inc
16. Notosiswoyo, dkk.2004. Pemanfaatan Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) sebagai Sarana Diagnosa Pasien, media Litbang Kesehatan Volume XIV Nomor 3 Tahun 2004. Jakarta
17. Hashemi, H Ray and Bladley, G. William,2010, MRI : The Basic third edition, Williams & Wilkins, USA
18. Rottmar M, Haralampieva D, Salemi S. Magnetization Transfer MR Imaging to Monitor Muscle Tissue Formation during Myogenic in Vivo Differentiation of Muscle Precursor Cells. Radiology. 2016;281(2):436-443.doi:10.1148/Radiol.2016152330
19. Westbrook, Catherine, 2014, Handbook of MRI Technigue, Fourth Edition, Blackwell Science LTd., United Kingdom
20. Foramen K. MRI at aGlade, 2nd Ed. By Catherine Westbrook. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 136 Pp.,2010. Softcover (ISBN: 978-1405192552).Vol 196,;2011.doi:2214/AJR.106192
21. Ali Naragi, M. White Lawrence. 2012. Tree-Dimensional MRI of the Musculoskeletal System. Joint Department of Medical Imaging, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto American Roentgen Ray Soclety. DOI:10.2214/AJR.12.9099
22. Ristow Oliver et. Al, 2009, Isotropic 3D fast spin-echo imaging versus standard 2D imaging at 3.0 T of the knee—image quality and diagnostic performance., University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA., DOI 10.1007/s00330-008-1260-y