<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Dual task performance and executive function in physically under active and physically active elderly: A comparison</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group content-type="author">
        <contrib contrib-type="person">
          <name>
            <given-names>Dr. Atiya.Shaikh</given-names>
          </name>
          <email>priyanka16parate@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="person">
          <name>
            <given-names>Dr. Priyanka.Parate</given-names>
          </name>
          <email>priyanka16parate@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff-1">
        <institution>PHD scholar, KEM, Mumbai, India.     MPT Student, DESBJ College of PT, Pune, India</institution>
        <country>India</country>
      </aff>
      <aff id="aff-2">
        <institution>MPT Student, DESBJ College of PT, Pune, India</institution>
        <country>India</country>
      </aff>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2020-08-19">
          <day>19</day>
          <month>08</month>
          <year>2020</year>
        </date>
      </history>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <fig>
      <graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="jpeg" xlink:href="image1.jpeg"/>
    </fig>
    <p>
      <bold>www.ijamscr.com</bold>
    </p>
    <p>
      <bold>Dual task performance and executive function in physically</bold>
      <bold>under active and physically active elderly: A comparison</bold>
    </p>
    <p>
      <bold>Dr. </bold>
      <bold>Atiya.Shaikh</bold>
      <bold> (PT</bold>
      <bold>)</bold>
      <bold>
        <sup>1</sup>
      </bold>
      <bold>, </bold>
      <bold>Dr.Priyanka</bold>
      <bold>Parate</bold>
      <bold>
        <sup>2*</sup>
      </bold>
    </p>
    <p>
      <italic>
        <sup>1</sup>
      </italic>
      <italic>Assistant professor, DESBJ College of PT, Pune, India</italic>
    </p>
    <p>
      <italic>
        <sup>1</sup>
      </italic>
      <italic>PHD scholar, KEM, Mumbai, India </italic>
    </p>
    <p>
      <italic>
        <sup>2</sup>
      </italic>
      <italic>MPT Student, DESBJ College of PT, Pune, India</italic>
    </p>
    <p><bold>*Corresponding Author</bold>:<bold>Priyanka.Parate</bold></p>
    <p>
      <bold>Email id: priyanka16parate@gmail.com</bold>
    </p>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>ABSTRACT</title>
      <p>
        <bold>Background</bold>
      </p>
      <p>Effect of being physically active on motor and cognitive function is well known. Indirect effect of being physically active on dual tasking needs to be explored. </p>
      <p>
        <bold>Aim &amp; Objectives</bold>
      </p>
      <p>To compare dual tasking and executive function in physically active and underactive elderly.</p>
      <p>
        <bold>Method</bold>
      </p>
      <p>124 Elderly were divided in to physically active and non-active using Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity (RAPA) scale and assessed for their Dual tasking skills using TUG-Cog, TUG-motor. Data was analyzed using unpaired t test.</p>
      <p>
        <bold>Result</bold>
      </p>
      <p>Physically active elderly performed significantly better than underactive elderly on Tug cog ,manual in both groups (p&lt;0.001)</p>
      <p>
        <bold>Conclusion</bold>
      </p>
      <p>Physically active elderly have better dual tasking skills than their physically underactive counterparts.</p>
      <p><bold>Keywords:</bold> Dual tasking, Elderly, Physical activity </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2"/>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>INTRODUCTION</title>
      <p>Many activities of daily life involve simultaneous performance of multiple tasks which concurrently challenge motor and cognitive functions [1]. Aging leads to abnormal alterations that compromise the performance of motor skills, including impaired postural control, abnormal posture/ gait/ balance. This leads to a reduction in functional capacity thus causing difficulties in adapting to the environment, all of which can lead to a greater risk of falls [2-4].</p>
      <p>The ability to perform multiple tasks which are common in daily living such as walking while engaged in a concurrent mental task (e.g. walking while talking, crossing road while carrying objects etc.) is impaired in elderly which is commonly correlated with fallsc<sup>10</sup>. Most of significant decrements in gait and/ or cognitive performance are observed in older adults when cognitive tasks are performed while walking [1]. </p>
      <p>Positive effects of exercises on physical, cognitive and psychological well-being in elderly have been proved widely [3, 4]. </p>
      <p>It was hypothesized that, those doing physical exercises regularly will have good cognitive and physical capabilities and hence dual task performance. The effects of such indirect neuroprotectivity mechanism of exercise on brain function and dual task performance need to be studied in detail. Hence, this study was planned with the aim to assess dual task performance and executive function in physically active and physically under active elderly.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY</title>
      <sec id="sec-4_1">
        <title>Type of study</title>
        <p>Cross sectional </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4_2">
        <title>Study population</title>
        <p>Elderly</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4_3">
        <title>Setting</title>
        <p>Community</p>
        <p>
          <bold>Outcome m</bold>
          <bold>easure</bold>
        </p>
        <p>The dual task performance was assessed using TUG- COG and TUG- MAN and executive function was assessed by using Trail making test part A and B, TUG-COG r= -0.66 and ICC = 0.94 and TUG-MAN r= -0.72 and ICC= 0.99 <sup>5</sup> both have been found to have good validity and reliability [6, 7].</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4_4">
        <title> Inclusion criteria</title>
        <p>Able to walk alone in neighborhood without any walking aid for at least once a day, Both genders,65 years and above, able to read, understand, interpret in English, Willing to participate in study., Geriatric Depression Scale score- 0- 9 score (suggesting no depression) [8], Mini Mental Scale Examination score- &gt;27-30(suggesting no cognitive impairment) [9], Time up and go test timing- ≤ 10 secs score (suggesting no functional balance deficits) [10]</p>
        <p>They were further divided in to following two groups</p>
        <list list-type="order">
          <list-item>
            <p>Physically active group- 30 mins of physical exercises 5 times per week85 (Common finding from previous studies as a criteria to decide elderly being physically active or underactive) and RAPA score above 6 [11]</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>
            <p>Physically underactive group- RAPA score below 6, physical exercise less than 30 mins or less than 5 times per week [11]</p>
          </list-item>
        </list>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4_5">
        <title>Exclusion criteria</title>
        <p>Orthopaedic conditions like lower limb fracture, severe arthritis, deformities that can hinder walking abilities, Neurological conditions like, stroke, parkinsonism, sensory deficits, diabetic neuropathy, peripheral vascular disease that can affect walking abilities, Visual and vestibular processing insufficiency that can affect walking abilities.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>SAMPLING TECHNIQUE </title>
      <p>Convenience</p>
      <sec id="sec-5_1">
        <title>Sample size</title>
        <p>248</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5_2">
        <title>Parameters for sample size calculation</title>
        <p>Zα =1.96( corresponding to type 1 error of 5% i.e 0.05),Zβ =1.282 (corresponding to power of 90%), σ = standard deviation ,d = mean Formula- n = 2(Zα+Zβ)2 ×(σ)2 /(d)2 , n = 124 ,Therefore , sample size -124 in each group</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>METHODOLOGY </title>
      <p>After obtaining clearance from the institutional ethics committee and written consent of participants, they were screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Basic screening was to done categorize them in to physically active(A) and underactive(B).They were assessed for Executive function using Trail making test A and B and Dual task performance using TUG-cognitive, TUG-manual Test. Adequate rest pauses were given as per participants comfort.  Sequence of tests was decided by chit method. Scores of each test i.e TUG, TUG- COG, TUG- MAN were compared in both groups using SPSS 22.00</p>
      <p>
        <bold>Table 1- Gender distribution in physically under active and physically active elderly</bold>
      </p>
      <table-wrap>
        <table>
          <tr>
            <td/>
            <td>
              <bold>Physically Underactive</bold>
            </td>
            <td>
              <bold>%</bold>
            </td>
            <td>
              <bold>Physically Underactive</bold>
            </td>
            <td>
              <bold>%</bold>
            </td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Male</td>
            <td>90</td>
            <td>72%</td>
            <td>90</td>
            <td>72%</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Female</td>
            <td>35</td>
            <td>28%</td>
            <td>35</td>
            <td>28%</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Total</td>
            <td>124</td>
            <td>100%</td>
            <td>124</td>
            <td>100%</td>
          </tr>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p>
        <bold>Table 2 –Comparison of age distribution in physically under active and physically active elderly</bold>
      </p>
      <table-wrap>
        <table>
          <tr>
            <td>
              <bold>Age</bold>
            </td>
            <td>
              <bold>Physically Under active</bold>
            </td>
            <td>
              <bold>Physically active</bold>
            </td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Mean</td>
            <td>71.282</td>
            <td>71.5</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>SD</td>
            <td>3.545</td>
            <td>3.863</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>SEM</td>
            <td>0.3171</td>
            <td>0.907</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Test</td>
            <td colspan="2">Man- Whitney U test</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>p value</td>
            <td colspan="2">0.4536</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Inference</td>
            <td colspan="2">Not significant difference.</td>
          </tr>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p>
        <bold>Table 3 - Comparison of tug- cog tug-man (in secs) in physically under active and physically active elderly</bold>
      </p>
      <table-wrap>
        <table>
          <tr>
            <td/>
            <td>
              <bold>Physically Under active</bold>
            </td>
            <td>
              <bold>Physically active</bold>
            </td>
            <td>
              <bold>Physically Under active</bold>
            </td>
            <td>
              <bold>Physically active</bold>
            </td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td/>
            <td colspan="2">
              <bold>TUG-COG</bold>
            </td>
            <td colspan="2">
              <bold>TUG-MAN</bold>
            </td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Mean</td>
            <td>12.1152</td>
            <td>8.56</td>
            <td>13.368</td>
            <td>10.572</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>SD</td>
            <td>1.233</td>
            <td>1.157</td>
            <td>0.862</td>
            <td>1.238</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>SEM</td>
            <td>0.1103</td>
            <td>0.1034</td>
            <td>0.0771</td>
            <td>0.1107</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Test</td>
            <td colspan="2">Man- Whitney U test</td>
            <td colspan="2">Man- Whitney U test</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>p value</td>
            <td>&lt;0.0001</td>
            <td/>
            <td colspan="2">&lt;0.0001</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td>Inference</td>
            <td colspan="2">Extremely significant.</td>
            <td colspan="2">Extremely significant.</td>
          </tr>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7"/>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>DISCUSSION</title>
      <p>Gender, age, physical capacity can be important confounding factors for such type of studies. Both the groups were similar at baseline for these components hence, comparable on the basis of these confounding factors.</p>
      <p>This study showed that, physically active elderly performed significantly better in tasks involving dual components and executive function as compared to their underactive counterparts. Although there is wide literature available on dual tasking, in our view, this is first study to compare dual tasking in physically active and underactive elderly. </p>
      <p>Following can be the reasons for physically active elderly to be better in performance</p>
      <sec id="sec-8_1">
        <title>Physical activity and its effects on physical performance</title>
        <p>Various studies have demonstrated positive effect of physical activity on physical performance parameters like strength, endurance, ostogenesis, reaction time, balance etc. This can increase in relative effort associated with task speed or quality and hence increasing overall capacity leading to increase in Dual task efficiency [12, 13]. Steffen TM in their study follow up study also supports this hypothesis were they found the mobility decline to be reduced those being physically active irrespective of other comorbidities [10] There are various longitudinal studies which demonstrated that regular physical activity is useful in reducing mortality and enhancing mobility and promoting healthy aging [14, 16].  Many other studies demonstrated a dose response pattern for physical activity which they found to physical active lifestyle to reduce a risk of physical function [17, 18].</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-8_2">
        <title>Exercises and its positive impact on cognitive functions</title>
        <p>Many researches have proved positive effect of physical activity on cognitive functions thru different mechanisms and different doses and trainings [19-21]. It can be summarized as follows</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-8_3">
        <title>Stimulation of neuroplasticity through angiogenesis</title>
        <p>Blood supply to brain declines with aging. Physical activity enhances blood supply to brain and thus functioning indirectly. Hippocampal angiogenesis due to sustained moderate-level physical activity leads to improvements in learning and memory function. A F-MRI study done to find association between brain connectivity and fitness showed that, brain connectivity was increased in those with higher levels of fitness than in those with lower fitness levels [22, 23].</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-8_4">
        <title>Neurotrophins</title>
        <p>Endogenous brain proteins which promote neuroplasticity i.e. neurotrophins play an important cognitive function [24]. They are secreted in response to physical activity. Following hormones play a key role </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-8_5">
        <title>G-CSF (Granulocyte colony stimulating factor)</title>
        <p>Increase in plasma levels of G- CSF have been found after short bursts of aerobic exercise and following sustained endurance exercise. This is found to increase cerebral grey matter volume which is important for increased cognitive reserve thus learning capacity and memory streamline [25, 26].</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-8_6">
        <title>BDNF (Brain derived neurotrophic factor)</title>
        <p>It is important for survival of neurons in the hippocampus, cortex, and cerebellum during brain development. Synaptophysin and synaptobrevin, substances which transport neurotrophins to neurotransmitter vesicles are increased by BDNF .It has seen to be increased in adults who engage in aerobic exercises [27-29].</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-8_7">
        <title>IGF-1(Insulin like growth factor 1)</title>
        <p>It  has been found to promote neuronal growth in adults alter 6 months of moderate to high level of resistance activities [30].</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-8_8">
        <title>Enhanced cardiovascular health leading to positive effects on CNS</title>
        <p>It is positively associated with brain health and cognitive performance [31, 32]. Studies show association between hypertension and poor performance on attention, visuospatial abilities, perceptual and psychomotor abilities and memory in older adults [33]. Hypertension has been found to decrease blood flow, slower metabolism, especially in frontal and temporal lobes and white matter atrophy [34]. Thus, controlling hypertension might be one of the ways to reduce decline in cognitive performances. Regular Physical Activity is proved to be useful to decrease detrimental effects of hypertension on body [35]. Thus, it can be safely assumed that, those who maintain regular physical activities/ aerobic activities may benefit in reducing hypertension. This might provide a protective neuro cognitive effect thus sound brain functions. Studies also showed, hippocampal volume which is positively associated with spatial memory function is found to be improved in those having good aerobic capacity [36].</p>
        <p>Many epidemiological and longitudinal systematic reviews studies have reported positive relation between physical activity and cognitive skills in healthy older adults [37-39].</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-8_9">
        <title>General neuroprotective effects</title>
        <p>Active lifestyle also prevents stress by decreasing cortisol levels which can also positively influence cognitive function [40]. Many longitudinal studies have also shown an association between higher level of physical activity and cognitive decline [41-43]. Current study also found similar results with respect to executive function which is one of the important components of cognitive function in those being physically active. Physically active elderly were very fast to complete the task as compared to physically under active elderly. </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-8_10">
        <title>Automaticity and its effect on enhanced physical performance, cognitive performance</title>
        <p>According to principle of automaticity, while doing dual tasking, if one task is automatic, or easy to perform, an individual can divert his attention on other task. Thus, performing optimal in both task components given dual task condition [44]. Regular Exercises like walking can help for the automation of gait skills and balance [45]. The physically active group might have had the added advantage of enhanced balance and automation of gait related skills they also had better executive function as compared to physically under active elderly. Thus may be they could concentrate on given cognitive or manual task and perform well on TUG COG and TUG MAN as compared to physically under active group. Thus we can say that, when the physical and cognitive functioning is improved, the dual task performance can be improved. </p>
        <p>Keeping theories of dual task in mind, better cognitive and physical reserve might help to decrease interference. Task automaticity also might have given the added advantage to physically active elderly. Hence, physically active elderly participants might have been able to concentrate better on both tasks as compared to their under active elderly counter parts. Hence, securing statistical significant better scores on TUG cognitive and TUG manual tests. </p>
        <p>Although we could not come across any similar studies showing a direct association in positive effect of physical activity on dual task performance since, physical activity has shown to enhance physical and cognitive function efficiently, the positive effects on dual task performance can be linked to this change. </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-9">
      <title>CLINICAL IMPLICATION</title>
      <p>Society and policy makers should utilize this information for creating awareness and efficient policies to enhance physical activity in adults which in turn will help to prevent decrease in physical, cognitive functions and hence dual task functioning which in turn may help to decrease risk of falls, cost of care and enhancing quality of life. </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-10">
      <title>LIMITATION AND FUTURE SCOPE</title>
      <p>Current study included elderly with basic qualification of graduation, other cognitive functions (e.g. memory, reaction time) and physical functions (e.g. strength, flexibility) were not assessed. Other tasks assessing Dual task performance were not included (as functional balance was core area of interest).Only motor component of TUG was considered and performance for cognitive task was not studied hence, dual task interference cannot be commented. Future studies should focus on comparing dual task interference. Effect of different physical activity enhancement/ rehabilitation protocols can be compared in physically active and physically under active elderly.  Another study can be done to identify factors influencing choice of lifestyle (physically active/ under active lifestyle) in individuals and its effect on dual task performance and executive function.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-11">
      <title>REFERENCES</title>
      <list list-type="bullet">
        <list-item>
          <p> Hausdorff JM, Schweiger A, and Herman T, Yogev- Seligmann G. Dual-task decrements in gait: contributing factors among healthy older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 63(12), 2008, 1335-43. </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Chang M, Jonsson P. V, Snaedal J. The effect of midlife physical activity on cognitive function among older adults. Journals of Gerontology, 65(12), 2010, 1369–1374. </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>KramerA. F, Bherer L, Colcombe S. J, Dong W, and GreenoughW. T, Environmental influences on cognitive and brain plasticity during aging. Journals of Gerontology, 59(9), 2004, 940–957. </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Liu-Ambrose T, Nagamatsu L. S, Graf P, Beattie B. L, Ashe M. C, and Handy T. C. Resistance training and executive functions: a 12-month randomized controlled trial,” Archives of Internal Medicine, 170(2), 2010, 170–178. </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>McAuley E, Rudolph D. Physical activity, aging, and psychological well-being.J Aging Phys Activity. 3, 1995, 67-96.</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res 17, 1983, 37-49. </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR.Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12, 1975, 189-198. </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Steffen TM, Hacker TA, Mollinger L. Age- and gender-related test performance in community-dwelling elderly people: six-minute walk test, Berg balance scale, timed up &amp; go test, and gait speeds. Phys Ther. 82(2), 2002, 128.</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Hannon Peggy, Christensen Kitty. University of Washington Health Promotion Research Center, 2006. </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Neva J Kirk-Sanchezand Ellen L McGough. Physical exercise and cognitive performance in the elderly: current perspectives. Clin Interv Aging. 9, 2014, 51–62. </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Wickens, Braune, Christopher D. Age differences in the speed and capacity of information processing: I. A dual-task approach. Psychology and Aging, 2(1), 1987, 70-78. </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Harber MP, Konopka AR, Douglass MD, Minchev K, Kaminsky LA, Trappe TA, Trappe S. Aerobic exercise training improves whole muscle and single myofiber size and function in older women. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 297(5), 2009, R1452–9. </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Jamie S. McPhee, David P. French, Dean Jackson, James Nazroo, Neil Pendleton. Physical activity in older age: perspectives for healthy ageing and frailty. Biogerontology. 17, 2016, 567–580. </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Hamer M, Lavoie KL, Bacon SL. Taking up physical activity in later life and healthy ageing. British Journal of Sports Medicine.10.1136/bjsports-2013-092993, 2013.</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Sabia S, Singh-Manoux A, Hagger-Johnson G, Cambois E, Brunner EJ, Kivimaki M. Influence of individual and combined healthy behaviours on successful aging. Can Med Assoc J. 184, 2012, 1985–1992. </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Hillsdon MM, Brunner EJ, Guralnik JM, Marmot MG. Prospective study of physical activity and physical function in early old age. Is J Prev Med. 28(3), 2005, 245-250. </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Roh KH, Park HA. A meta-analysis of the effect of walking exercise on lower limb muscle endurance, whole body endurance and upper body flexibility in elders. J Korean Acad Nurs. 43, 2013, 536–546. </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Hamer M, Chida Y. Physical activity and risk of neurodegenerative disease: a systematic review of prospective evidence. Psychol Med. 39(1), 2009, 3–11. </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>AlbinetC. T, Boucard G, Bouquet C. A, and Audiffren M. Increased heart rate variability and executive performance after aerobic training in the elderly. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 109(4), 2010, 617–624. </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Kamijo K., Hayashi Y., Sakai T., Yahiro T., Tanaka K., Nishihira Y. Acute effects of aerobic exercise on cognitive function in older adults. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 64B, 2009, 356-363. </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Mahoney J.R., Verghese J., Goldin Y., Lipton R., Holtzer R. Alerting, orienting, and executive attention in older adults. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2010, 877-889.</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Erickson KI, Voss MW, Prakash RS, et al. Exercise training increases size of hippocampus and improves memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 108, 2011, 3017–3022.</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Sarah Khasawinah, Brian Caffo, Kirk I Erickson. The association between functional connectivity and cognition in older adults. J Syst Integr Neurosci, 3(3), 2017, 1-10 </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Yamada M, Suzuki K, Kudo S, Totsuka M, Nakaji S, Sugawara K. Raised plasma G-CSF and IL-6 after exercise may play a role in neutrophil mobilization into the circulation. J Appl Physiol, 92, 1985, 1789–1794. </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Coen RF, Lawlor BA, Kenny R. Failure to demonstrate that memory improvement is due either to aerobic exercise or increased hippocampal volume. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 108, 2011, E89. </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Richter-Schmidinger T, Alexopoulos P, Horn M, et al. Influence of brain-derived neurotrophic-factor and apolipoprotein E genetic variants on hippocampal volume and memory performance in healthy young adults. J Neural Transm. 118, 2011, 249–257. </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Matthew T. Schmolesky, David L. Webb, and Rodney A. Hansen. The Effects of Aerobic Exercise Intensity and Duration on Levels of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor in Healthy Men. J Sports Sci Med. 12(3), 2013, 502–511. </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Emrah Duzel, Henriette Van Praag, and Michael Sendtner. Can physical exercise in old age improve memory and hippocampal function?.Brain. 139(3), 2016, 662–673. </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Al-Yahya E, Dawes H, Smith L. Cognitive motor interference while walking: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 35(3), 2011, 715-28. </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Sandra B. Chapman, Sina Aslan, Jeffrey S. Spence. Shorter term aerobic exercise improves brain, cognition, and cardiovascular fitness in aging. Front Aging Neurosci. 5, 2013, 75. </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>137) Grodstein F. Cardiovascular risk factors and cognitive function. Alzheimers Dement. 3(2), 2007, S16–S22. </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Waldstein SR. The relation of hypertension to cognitive function. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 12(1), 2003, 9–12. </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Keith M. Diaz and Daichi Shimbo. Physical Activity and the Prevention of Hypertension. Curr Hypertens Rep. 15(6), 2013, 659–668. </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Burns JM, Cronk BB, Anderson HS, et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness and brain atrophy in early Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 71(3), 2008, 210–216. </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Erickson KI, Prakash RS, Voss MW, et al. Aerobic fitness is associated with hippocampal volume in elderly humans. Hippocampus. 19(10), 2009, 1030–1039. </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Etnier JL, Nowell PM, Landers DM, Sibley BA. A meta-regression to examine the relationship between aerobic fitness and cognitive performance. Brain Res Rev. 52, 2006, 119–30. </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Hayes SM, Hayes JP, Cadden M, Verfaellie M. A review of cardiorespiratory fitness-related neuroplasticity in the aging brain. Front Aging Neurosci. 5, 2013, 31. </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Voelcker-Rehage C, Niemann C. Structural and functional brain changes related to different types of physical activity across the life span. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 37, 2013, 2268–95. </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Bruce S. McEwen. Central effects of stress hormones in health and disease: understanding the protective and damaging effects of stress and stress mediators. Eur J Pharmacol. 583(2-3), 2008, 174–185. </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Michael Daly, David McMinn and Julia L. Allan. Relationship between physical activity and executive function in older adults. Front Hum Neurosci. 8, 2014, 1044. </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Ploughman M. Exercise is brain food: the effects of physical activity on cognitive function. Dev Neurorehabil. 11, 2008, 236–240 </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Heather A Henderson, Daniel S Pine, and Nathan A Fox. Behavioral Inhibition and Developmental Risk: A Dual-Processing Perspective. Neuro psycho pharmacology. 40(1), 2015, 207–224. </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Coppin AK, Shumway-Cook A, Saczynski JS, Association of executive function and performance of dual-task physical tests among older adults: analyses from the In Chianti study. Age Ageing. 35, 2006, 619–624</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Jennifer S. Brach, PhD, PT and Jessie M. VanSwearingen. Interventions to Improve Walking in Older Adults. Curr Transl Geriatr Exp Gerontol Rep. 2(4), 2013, 10.1007/s13670-013-0059-0</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Paolo Riccardo Brustio, Daniele Magistro, Massimiliano Zecca. Age-related decrements in dual-task performance: Comparison of different mobility and cognitive tasks. A cross sectional study. PLoS One, 12(7), 2017, e0181698.</p>
        </list-item>
      </list>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back/>
</article>
