<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Effectiveness of the use module handling emergency retention plasenta in training on midwive attitude</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group content-type="author">
        <contrib contrib-type="person">
          <name>
            <given-names>Dewi Yanti</given-names>
          </name>
          <email>dewi@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff-1">
        <institution>Poltekkes Kemenkes Semarang / Semarang, Indonesia</institution>
        <country>Indonesia</country>
      </aff>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2020-08-13">
          <day>13</day>
          <month>08</month>
          <year>2020</year>
        </date>
        <date data-type="published" iso-8601-date="2020-08-13">
          <day>13</day>
          <month>08</month>
          <year>2020</year>
        </date>
      </history>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <fig>
      <graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="jpeg" xlink:href="image1.jpeg"/>
    </fig>
    <p>
      <bold>www.ijamscr.com</bold>
    </p>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>Effectiveness of the use module handling emergency retention PLASENTA in training on MIDWIVE attitude</title>
      <sec id="sec-1_1">
        <title>Dewi Yanti<sup>1</sup>, Kun A. Susiloretni<sup>2</sup>, Sudirman<sup>3</sup></title>
        <p>
          <italic>
            <sup>1</sup>
          </italic>
          <italic>Poltekkes </italic>
          <italic>Kemenkes</italic>
          <italic> Semarang / Semarang, Indonesia</italic>
        </p>
        <p>
          <italic>
            <sup>2</sup>
          </italic>
          <italic>Poltekkes </italic>
          <italic>Kemenkes</italic>
          <italic> Semarang / Semarang, Indonesia</italic>
        </p>
        <p>
          <italic>
            <sup>3</sup>
          </italic>
          <italic>Poltekkes </italic>
          <italic>Kemenkes</italic>
          <italic> Semarang / Semarang, Indonesia</italic>
        </p>
        <p><bold>*Corresponding Author</bold>:<bold>Dewi</bold><bold>Yanti</bold></p>
        <sec id="sec-1_1_1">
          <title>Abstract</title>
          <sec id="sec-1_1_1_1">
            <title>Background</title>
            <p>Midwives telatih more appreciated, more confident and capable of behaving with incidents obstetric complications. [1] When the knowledge and attitude of a midwife is low, the possibility of vaginal birth and treatment of complications is difficult. [2] Less than optimal attitude for the officers acted appropriately, and the fear and confusion attendant identified as a major obstacle in providing obstetric care services. [3] Pregnant women complained that the assistance they received during labor is not adequate and questioned about the attitude and competence of midwives and doctors that address. [4] Necessary efforts to overcome the lack of adequate attitude in handling obstetric emergency personnel including retained placenta. Optimizing retrieval capability right attitude and immediately, Thought to beone with learning enhanced through training modules. This enelitian create a simple module modified with an algorithm on the front cover. In order to guide the midwife in making the proper attitude and immediately if encountered the case of retained placenta. expected to avoid mishandling and delays in handling Refer.</p>
          </sec>
          <sec id="sec-1_1_1_2">
            <title>Objective</title>
            <p>Knowing the effective use of retained placenta emergency handling module on the attitudes midwife training and development modules.</p>
          </sec>
          <sec id="sec-1_1_1_3">
            <title>Method</title>
            <p>Experiment study randomized trial control group pretest-posttest design approach with a questionnaire. The independent variable use emergency handling module placenta in training. The dependent variable attitudes midwife. Confounding variables: age, length of employment, education, and experience retained placenta menanangani Population: midwife in the community in seven health centers and a sample of 50 participants.</p>
          </sec>
          <sec id="sec-1_1_1_4">
            <title>Results</title>
            <p>The use of retained placenta emergency handling module on training, Effectively improve the attitude of 0.63 points (95% CI 0.46-0.79) p = 0.001, an increase of 45.82%.</p>
            <p>Training modules using the emergency handling of retained placenta most effectively improve posture (45.82%).</p>
            <p>Keywords: Attitude, Modules, Training, Handling emergencies and Retained placenta.</p>
          </sec>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-1_1_2"/>
        <sec id="sec-1_1_3">
          <title>Introduction</title>
          <p>Midwives telatih more appreciated, more confident and competent in handling obstetric complications occurrence.[1] When the knowledge and attitude of a midwife is low, the possibility of vaginal birth and treatment of complications is difficult.[2] Less than optimal attitude for the officers acted appropriately, and the attendant confusion was identified as a major obstacle in providing midwifery care.[3] Pregnant women complained that the assistance they received during labor is not adequate and questioned about the attitude and competence of midwives and doctors that address.[4] Necessary efforts to overcome the lack of adequate attitude in handling obstetric emergency personnel including retained placenta. Optimize decision right attitude and immediately, Thought to beone with learning enhanced through training modules. PThis enelitian create a simple module modified with an algorithm on the front cover. In order to guide the midwife in making the proper attitude and immediately if encountered the case of retained placenta. expected to avoid mishandling and delays in handling Refer.</p>
          <p>Delays and lack of adequate obstetric emergency first aid treatment including retained placenta by officers (midwives) are at risk of life-threatening mother. This illustrates the low quality of the first treatment in emergency obstetrics independently by a midwife. The amount of trust a mother to give birth with a midwife (70%), should be supported by the quality of service that is based on the optimization of kemampauan taking a stand.</p>
          <p>Results of analysis of the Ministry of Health and WHO, HOGSI, UNICEF and UNFPA in 2012, that the mother and child care in Indonesia is still lacking in quality, particularly the handling of emergency obstetrics. [5] Emergency management of complications and poor-quality, closely related to the quality penolongan and maternity facilities that contribute to high maternal morbidity and mortality.[6] Less qualified service conditions under which service standards, handling missed not even available means and not based on evidence that terjadiketerlambatan handling and Refer.[7]</p>
          <p>The attitude of improper handling of them, still their fault or lack of adequate treatment on postpartum hemorrhage including retained placenta and fault management of third stage of labor which is the sole cause of the occurrence of postpartum hemorrhage to life-threatening shock mother.[8] The third stage errors include uterine already Di Massage before the placenta separated from the uterine wall that would cause retention with active bleeding or hidden and can almost be predicted to occur bleeding of the third stage [9], Massaging the uterus and push it down to delivery of the placenta can cause bleeding atonic [8], And the placenta is separated but not delivered immediately causing contraction circle at the bottom of the uterus (placental inkarseratio) that become the placenta barrier.[8] An emergency postpartum hemorrhage caused by uterine atony, retained placenta with a partially detached from the uterus (kesalahanan officer because the uterus is already DiMassage before the placenta separated from the uterine wall and can almost be predicted to occur bleeding of the third stage), injuries to the birth canal and retained placenta. [10, 8] </p>
          <p>Retained placenta is also a major cause of maternal mortality in PPH. Magann et al explain, if the placenta has not been born more than 30 minutes (3% incidence in vaginal deliveries) will occur PPH 6x larger.<sup>11</sup>This bleeding is rare if not wrong handling of the third stage. This situation shows the third stage of labor management were less accurate and adequate. Management of the inadequate delivery of the placenta can cause variations in the amount of bleeding. The risk of bleeding increases if the delivery of the placenta lasts more than 30 minutes are known as retained placenta emergency complications.<sup>9</sup>Varney explained that, behind the placenta (placenta retention) resulted in no visible bleeding that will threaten the life of the mother. Not only midwife who gives care to the third stage, but bidanlah responsible for arranging its management.<sup>9</sup> Mothers with retained placenta without haemorrhage should be referred immediately and prohibited from doing manual placenta.[12]</p>
          <p>Manual placenta had to be done because there is bleeding that accompanies the placenta, uterus in order to discharge immediately and these are listed in the authority of the midwife as first aid.<sup>13</sup> WHO reported that 16-17% of postpartum hemorrhage caused by a retained placenta and 2/3 cause of maternal mortality.<sup>14</sup>According to preliminary study data obtained by researchers in April 2019. About 36% of the officers met and retained placenta emergency menagani more than 10 times during the practice community. Approximately 64% meet and menagani emergencies retained placenta is less than 10 times during practice (there were &lt;10 years and&gt; 10 years).</p>
          <p>Allegedly less optimal capability of taking the right attitude and soon, also affects the less inadequate handling and delays Refer kewatdaruratan obstetrics. The attitude of a person will be affected by the environment, experience and education.[15]</p>
          <p>Learning to effectively change the misconceptions believed module participants toward scientific concepts, thus optimizing the quality of the knowledge and ability to behave. [16]Kegawatdarutan handling module contains components retained placenta Midwifery Services Standard (DSS) with government guidelines that have been made in accordance with WHO recommendations that have been adapted to the state of Indonesia. Many midwives do not know so do not take advantage of this CMS. Results of a preliminary study researcher in April 2019, from 20 midwives interviewed only 2 (10%) ever memafaatkannya. They were more (18) based on the book maternal neonatal (not complete SPK), APN book (which did adopt SPK, but more perfect SPK) and lecture notes.</p>
          <p>Another advantage of media modules can be studied independently, more attractive and effective because it is the smallest unit of learning, relevant materials with a focus on competence and efficiency penggandan affordable cost. While the book, menururt Muslich, too many lessons are presented, with the full text tend to be boring and deadly interest in reading and penggadaan cost is quite high. Attitudes acquired through learning and training can be formed through experiences. Because of that attitude can be changed according to individual environments at different times and places. Attitude is not talent or innate. Attitude merupkan the relationship between object and subject.[17]</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-1_1_4">
          <title>Research purposes</title>
          <p>Determine the effectiveness of the use of emergency handling module retained placenta. the training of midwives attitude.</p>
          <sec id="sec-1_1_4_1">
            <title>Research methods</title>
            <p>Experiment study randomized trial control group pretest-posttest design approach with a questionnaire. The independent variable use emergency handling module placenta in training. The dependent variable attitudes midwife. Confounding variables: age, length of employment, education, and experience retained placenta menanangani Population: midwife practice at seven health centers in the community. Sample 50 intervention and control group participants.</p>
          </sec>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-1_1_5">
          <title>Research result</title>
          <p>
            <bold>Table </bold>
            <bold>1</bold>
            <bold>, Basic Characteristics of the participants in the intervention group and control group</bold>
          </p>
          <table-wrap>
            <table>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Characteristics of participants</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold>Intervention group</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="2">
                  <bold> The control group</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>p</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td/>
                <td>mean </td>
                <td>± ± SD</td>
                <td>mean</td>
                <td>± SD</td>
                <td/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Age</td>
                <td>36.04</td>
                <td>6:30</td>
                <td>38.04</td>
                <td>9:36</td>
                <td>0254</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Education</td>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>DIII</td>
                <td>21</td>
                <td>84%</td>
                <td>24</td>
                <td>96%</td>
                <td>0157</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Length of working</td>
                <td>13.92</td>
                <td>7:02</td>
                <td>15:50</td>
                <td>10:27</td>
                <td>0248</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Experience emergency menanangani retained placenta</td>
                <td>5.84</td>
                <td>5:25</td>
                <td>6:38</td>
                <td>6:27</td>
                <td>1,000</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Workplace</td>
                <td>f</td>
                <td>%</td>
                <td>f</td>
                <td>%</td>
                <td>0214</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>village midwife</td>
                <td>13</td>
                <td>52</td>
                <td>7</td>
                <td>28</td>
                <td/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>midwives PKM</td>
                <td>11</td>
                <td>44</td>
                <td>17</td>
                <td>68</td>
                <td/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>BPM</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>4</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td> 4</td>
                <td/>
              </tr>
            </table>
          </table-wrap>
          <p>Table 1 illustrates the mean age of 36.04 years intervention group and the control group of 38.04 years. Mean education intervention group participants 84% ​​DIII Midwifery and control 96%, the rest is educated DIV Midwifery. The average length of employment in the intervention group and control 15:50 13.92 years. Average experience dealing with emergencies retained placenta 5.84 times the intervention group and the control group 6:38 times.</p>
          <p>At the age data of participants with a value of p = 0.254 or p&gt; 0.05, mean age of participants intervention and control groups was no significant age difference between the two groups. Variants of both age groups and homogeneous. Education participants with p = 0.157, also no significant difference in the level of education DIII and DIV Midwifery midwifery between intervention and control groups. That is the second participant education variant homogeneous group. Length of work with a value of p = 0.248, meaning there is no longer a difference of meaningful work or homogeneous variant.</p>
          <p>Menanangani experience emergencies retained placenta with p = 1:00, also means there is no significant difference or variance is homogeneous. The frequency distribution workplace with a value of p = 0214, also means that there is no significant difference or variance is homogeneous.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-1_1_6">
          <title>Bivariate Analysis Results</title>
          <p>
            <bold>Table 2.</bold>
            <bold> Relationship Attitude Before and </bold>
            <bold>After</bold>
            <bold> treatment Using the Module Handling Emergency retained placenta On Training</bold>
          </p>
          <table-wrap>
            <table>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>variables</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="3">
                  <bold>The intervention group</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="3">
                  <bold>The control group</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="2">
                  <bold>p </bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="2">
                  <bold>P</bold>
                  <bold>Intervention</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td/>
                <td>
                  <bold>mean </bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>± SD</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>P</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>mean</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>± SD</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>p</bold>
                </td>
                <td/>
                <td/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>value attitudes</td>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>pre test</td>
                <td>2.62</td>
                <td>0:29</td>
                <td/>
                <td>2.66</td>
                <td>0:24</td>
                <td/>
                <td>0068 </td>
                <td/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Post test</td>
                <td>3:25</td>
                <td>0:37</td>
                <td>0.001⁎⁎</td>
                <td>2.66</td>
                <td>0:25</td>
                <td>0.900⁎</td>
                <td>0067</td>
                <td/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>difference in attitude</td>
                <td>0.63</td>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td>0006</td>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td>0.001▪</td>
              </tr>
            </table>
          </table-wrap>
          <p>Wilkcoxon, Paired T test, ▪Independent T test,</p>
          <p>The mean value of the attitude control group is higher than the intervention group (2.66 vs. 2.62). In the pre-test value of p = 0795 attitudes among participants in the control group and the intervention had a significant difference (p&gt; 0.005). The intervention group had a mean attitude score (2.62 vs 3:25) was higher than the control group (2.66 vs. 2.66). Value posttest attitude of participants in the control group had significant difference p = 0.067 (p&gt; 0.005).</p>
          <p>With p = 0.001 in the intervention group showed no significant effect between pre and post test. While the control group showed no significant association with p value 0.100. Value pre and post test attitude control group (2.66 vs. 2.66) there was no improvement. While the value pre and post test the attitude of the intervention group (2.62 vs. 3:25) No significant increase.</p>
          <p>After treatment in the intervention group in the form of training in the use module handling emergencies retained placenta, obtained value of the post-test in the intervention group had a mean value of the attitude (3:25 vs 2.66) No significant increase with a p-value 0.001 Value of pre and post-test attitude (2.66 vs 2.66) no increase. Value pre and post intervention group (2.62 vs. 3:25) showed the most significant increase with p value 0.001.</p>
          <p>There are differences between the mean value of the results of pre-test and post-test after the training intervention with emergency handling module retained placenta. The intervention group had a mean perbedan attitude score (2.62 vs 3:25) no significant effect before and after the use of retained placenta emergency handling module on training on the attitudes of p = 0.001 (p &lt;0.005). This means that the use of retained placenta emergency handling module on giving a significant effect on improving knowledge, attitudes and self-efficacy of participants.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-1_1_7"/>
        <sec id="sec-1_1_8">
          <title>Multivariable analysis</title>
          <p>
            <bold>Table 3.</bold>
            <bold> Effectiveness of Using the Module Handling Emergency retained placenta On Training </bold>
            <bold>of</bold>
            <bold> Knowledge, Attitude and Attitude Midwives </bold>
            <bold>After Controlled With</bold>
            <bold> Variable Disruptors</bold>
          </p>
          <table-wrap>
            <table>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Variables</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="3">
                  <bold>Attitude</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td/>
                <td>Beta coefficient</td>
                <td>(95% CI)</td>
                <td>p</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Control</td>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Intervention</td>
                <td>0.63</td>
                <td>[0.46,0.79]</td>
                <td>0000</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>EducationD IVD III</td>
                <td>-0.0023</td>
                <td>[-0.28,0.27]</td>
                <td>0986</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Age&lt;40 years&gt; 40 years</td>
                <td>-0.26</td>
                <td>[-0.68,0.16]</td>
                <td>0222</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Length of working&lt;15 years&gt; 15 Years</td>
                <td>0:31</td>
                <td>[-0.11,0.74]</td>
                <td>0142</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Experience dealing with retained placenta&lt;10 times&gt; 10 times</td>
                <td>-0.12</td>
                <td>[-0.32,0.078]</td>
                <td>0227</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Pre Knowledge test</td>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Pre test Attitude</td>
                <td>-0.39</td>
                <td>[-0.71, -0067]</td>
                <td>0019</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Pre test Self Efficaci</td>
                <td/>
                <td/>
                <td/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Constant</td>
                <td>1:05</td>
                <td>[0.14,1.96]</td>
                <td>0025</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>pseudo R2 </td>
                <td>0634</td>
                <td/>
                <td/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Aic </td>
                <td/>
                <td>21.6</td>
                <td/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>df_m</td>
                <td>6</td>
                <td/>
                <td/>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Observation</td>
                <td>50</td>
                <td/>
                <td/>
              </tr>
            </table>
          </table-wrap>
          <p>95% confidence intervals in brackets</p>
          <p><italic>Regression</italic> </p>
          <p>aic = LR Test from Aka iki, df_m = degress of freedom of the models</p>
          <p> P &lt;0.05, p &lt;0:01, p &lt;0.001</p>
          <p>Beta coefficient value of 0.63 means that the attitude of the group intervention group had higher attitude score of 0.63 points (15%) compared to controls. P = 0.001 means that there is a significant relationship or no effect after treatment the use of retained placenta emergency handling module on training to increase participants' attitudes. 0:26 That coefficient at the age of participants aged ≤40 years had a higher attitude 0:26 points compared to age&gt; 40 years and there is a significant difference p = 0:18 (p&gt; 0.005). Participants who work ≤15 years old have a higher stance than the 0:31 point working time&gt; 15 years, but there was no significant difference p = 0:23. Participants were educated DIII Midwifery has a lower stance than 0,002 points DIV Midwifery educated, but there was no significant difference p = 0.986.</p>
          <p>Efektvitas increase participants' attitudes after the use of emergency handling module retained placenta were analyzed by linear regression. Determinant coefficient value (r-square) of 0597. This means that the influence of age, education and work long experience of dealing with retained placenta. Influence contributed by 59.7% against the knowledge of participants.</p>
          <p>Training modules use the results of the effectiveness of the "moderate" according to the criteria Ngain score. The theory of the division of scores effectiveness Ngain score sure; g values&gt; 0.7 category of high effectiveness, 0.3≤g≤0.7 effectiveness of the medium and g &lt;0.3 low effectiveness. The result of analysis NGain score against an increase of 45.82% Midwives attitude.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-1_1_9">
          <title>Discussion</title>
          <sec id="sec-1_1_9_1">
            <title>The changes and the effect of the use of retained placenta emergency handling module on training on attitudes </title>
            <p>Picture of the attitudes also showed significant differences in pre-test p = 0.068 and p = 0.067 post test. After experimental treatments use emergency handling module retained placenta with training, with a value of p = 0.001 showed a significant improvement or no effect on the increase in the attitude of the midwife. While the pre and post test the attitude of the participants in the control group (2.66 vs. 2.66), did not show an increase of no significant effect with p = 0.100. Liesabethanalyzed the last decade, Refer cases increased, which can partly be attributed to the attitude of a midwife because of insecurity and anxiety. This could threaten the long term associated with women who want to give birth at home.[17]</p>
          </sec>
          <sec id="sec-1_1_9_2">
            <title>Effective use of retained placenta emergency handling module on training of midwives attitude</title>
            <p>Regression coefficient value of 0.63 artnya attitude of the intervention group had a higher attitude score 0.63 points compared to controls. R2 = 0634. Based on 0001 means there is a significant effect of age, education, length of labor, retained placenta deal with its experience to the improvement of attitudes and accounted for 63.4% is influenced by other factors. The result of analysis NGain score Attitude intervention value of 0.4582 menunnjukkan efekktivitas use emergency handling module retained against an increase of 45.82% Midwives attitude.</p>
            <p>The picture is in line with research analysis Oflah but in the training of early detection of complications with BSE, that the increase in attitudes with p = 0.048 in the treatment group and 0003 in the control group, but there was no effect on attitudes training using the module.[18]</p>
            <p>Training with speaker teaching approach is someone who is experienced and respected according to Bandura's theory will increase interest in improving absorption pelatihan. sehingga more optimal understanding. According Boggosian correlative Analytical samples with questionnaires semi tersturktur midwife. Midwives telatih emergency care (abortion) stance was much appreciated. midwife confident provide competent support. 97% of midwives play an important role to give sufficient support among all health professionals involved in maternity care. The difference analysis kegawatdarurata case of retained placenta.<sup>1</sup>Marion analytic correlation analysis module using well-operated in the maternity hospital. The difference with the normal delivery of training materials handling kegawatdarurata retained placenta. Midwives with less experience, need support and training to contribute and to be providing services. When the midwife feels supported will increase confidence in the ability of (self-efficacy) helping normal delivery, will strengthen the resolve for more practice. Confidence is needed to generate confidence and must be cultivated in serving kebidanaan.[2] The study analyzed the attitude Kun A. midwife but in exclusive breastfeeding research menganalisakan that: participants (doctors, midwives) in the intervention group were given training on exclusive breastfeeding. Showed a significant increase in physician, clinical and non-clinical staff having received training (p &lt;0.05). When compared with the control group seen in the attitude of midwives do not show significant improvement.[19]</p>
          </sec>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-1_1_10">
          <title>Conclusion</title>
          <p>Training modules use the emergency handling of retained placenta, effectively improve the attitude of 0.63 points (95% CI 0.46-0.79) p = 0.001, an increase of 45.82% and an increase in the average value of 2.62 to 3.25.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-1_1_11">
          <title>Suggestion </title>
          <list list-type="order">
            <list-item>
              <p>Training modules use efficient handling of emergencies retained placenta increase midwife attitude. Research has resulted in the modification algorithm module on the front cover for easy reading and midwives to reach the current module retained cases occurred.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>For further research, research must be done with a better design with a larger sample to optimize the validity of the study. Need to add variables such as support for strengthening the attitude of the government, which instituted rules or SOP, reflection suvervisi received midwife and the type of training received emergency treatment midwife regularly.</p>
            </list-item>
          </list>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-1_1_12">
          <title>Reference</title>
          <list list-type="bullet">
            <list-item>
              <p>Bogossian F, Brodribb W, Farley R, Goodwin H, Tin A, Young J. A feasibility study to improve practice nurses' competence and confidence in providing care for mothers and infants. <italic>contemp Nurse</italic>, 53(5), 2017, 503-514. doi: 10.1080 / 10376178.2017.1281087</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>Hunter M, Smythe E, Spence D. Confidence: Fundamental to providing labor Midwives care in freestanding Midwifery-led units. <italic>Midwifery</italic>, 2018; 66: 176-181. doi: 10.1016 / j.midw. 08, 2018, 016</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>Roose M De, Tency I, Beeckman D, A Van Hecke, Verhaeghe S, Clays E. Author's Accepted Manuscript Midwives to Appear in: Midwifery. <italic>Midwifery</italic>, 2017. doi: 10.1016 / j.midw. 09, 2017, 017</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>Henriksen L, Grimsrud E, Schei B, Lukasse M. Factors related to a negative birth experience - A mixed methods study. <italic>Midwifery</italic>, 2017; 51: 33-39. doi: 10.1016 / j.midw. 05, 2017, 004</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>The Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia. Technical Guidelines for Independent Practice Direction and Supervision of Midwives. In Indonesia; 2018.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>The Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia. <italic>Indonesia Health Profile 2017</italic>, Indonesia; 2018.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>Miller S, Abalos E, Chamillard M, et al. Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide.<italic>Lancet</italic>, 388(10056), 2016, 2176-2192. doi: 10.1016 / S0140-6736 (16) 31472-6</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>Prawirihardjo S. <italic>Imu Midwifery</italic>, Indonesia; 2008.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>Varney, Helen: Kriebs, Jan: Gegor CR. <italic>Textbook of Obstetrics Asuha</italic>, Indonesia; 2008.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>H. Varney <italic>Textbook of Obstetrics Asuha (Varney's Midewifwry)</italic>, 2(4), 2008.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>Brahmin IB. Postpartum Hemorrhage by Placenta Retention Due to the P4a0Postpartum Spontaneous, Fetus Large, with Hypertension in Pregnancy. 18(1), 2018. doi: 10.18196 / mm.180112</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>The Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia. multiplied by the Regional Board of IBI Yogyakarta. Book 1 Midwifery Service Standards. In: duplicated by the Indonesian Midwives Association; 112, 2008.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>Naoi H, Kumasawa K, Nakamura H, Nishikawa A, Kimura T, Ogita K. Investigation of the Prognosis of 28 Patients with Retained Placenta After Delivery. 4(2), 2016, 7-11. doi: 10.11648 / j.jgo.20160402.11</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>Riyanto. Genesis Risk Factors retained placenta On Mother Maternity In dr. Bob H. Bazar, SKM Trump. VIII (1), 2015.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>Notoadmodjo S. <italic>Health Behavioral Science</italic>, Jakarta: PT Rieneke Citra; 2010.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>Santyasa wayan. <italic>Methods Development Research And Development Theory Modules</italic>, Indonesia; 2007.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>Sarwono SW. General Psychology. in:<italic>Psychology</italic>, Indonesia; 2012, 1-48.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>Oflah, Yustiana; Mendri, Ni Ketut; Suryani E. Effect of Using Training Module On Against Breast Cancer Knowledge, Interests And Behavior In Performing Breast Self-Examination (Realize) in Women Ages 20-40 Years In the province of Yogyakarta (DIY). 2014, 123-130.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>Susiloretni, Kun aristiati D. Effectiveness "multilevel Promotion" Against Exclusive breastfeeding Breastfeeding duration. <italic>Journal</italic>, 372, 2014.</p>
            </list-item>
          </list>
        </sec>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back/>
</article>
