<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Alternative control of blood pressure with tomatoes using the freeze drying method</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group content-type="author">
        <contrib contrib-type="person">
          <name>
            <given-names>Erni Juniartati</given-names>
          </name>
          <email>erni78.juniartati@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff-1">
        <institution>Poltekkes Kemenkes Semarang / Semarang, Indonesia</institution>
        <country>Indonesia</country>
      </aff>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2020-08-12">
          <day>12</day>
          <month>08</month>
          <year>2020</year>
        </date>
        <date data-type="published" iso-8601-date="2020-08-12">
          <day>12</day>
          <month>08</month>
          <year>2020</year>
        </date>
      </history>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <fig>
      <graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="jpeg" xlink:href="image1.jpeg"/>
    </fig>
    <p>
      <bold>www.ijamscr.com</bold>
    </p>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>Alternative control of blood pressure with tomatoes using the freeze drying method</title>
      <sec id="sec-1_1">
        <title>Erni Juniartati<sup>1</sup>*, Ari Suwondo<sup>2</sup>, Mursid<sup>3</sup></title>
        <p>
          <italic>
            <sup>1</sup>
          </italic>
          <italic>Poltekkes Kemenkes Semarang / Semarang,</italic>
          <italic>Indonesia</italic>
        </p>
        <p>
          <italic>
            <sup>2</sup>
          </italic>
          <italic>FKM Universitas Diponegoro / Semarang,</italic>
          <italic>Indonesia</italic>
        </p>
        <p>
          <italic>
            <sup>3</sup>
          </italic>
          <italic>Universitas Diponegoro / Semarang,</italic>
          <italic>Indonesia</italic>
        </p>
        <p><bold>*Corresponding Author</bold>:<bold>Erni</bold> <bold>Juniartati</bold></p>
        <p>
          <bold>Email id: </bold>
          <bold>erni78.juniartati@gmail.com</bold>
        </p>
        <sec id="sec-1_1_1">
          <title>ABSTRACT</title>
          <sec id="sec-1_1_1_1">
            <title>Background</title>
            <p>Hipertension is one of the causes of maternal and fetal death. Handling hypertensive pregnant woman have been done with pharmacological drugs but can caused side effect.Tomatoes containing potassium and lycopene are good for reducing blood pressure and malondialdehyde levels in pregnant women with hypertension.</p>
          </sec>
          <sec id="sec-1_1_1_2">
            <title>Objective</title>
            <p>To prove that dried tomatoes affect the decrease in blood pressure in pregnant women with hypertension.</p>
          </sec>
          <sec id="sec-1_1_1_3">
            <title>Methods</title>
            <p>Quasy Experimentwith pretest and posttest with control group design. The sample amounted to 32 pregnant woman divided intervention and control group. In the intervention group, antenatal care was given and dried tomatoes at a dose of 55 grams for 14 days and patients in the control group were given antenatal care only. Measurement of systolic and diastolic blood pressure were carried out every day as long as research. </p>
          </sec>
          <sec id="sec-1_1_1_4">
            <title>Results</title>
            <p>The analysis showed significant differences in systolic blood pressure between the intervention and control group with p value 0,001 and diastolic p value 0,001. In the intervention group experienced a decrease in systolic of 16,812 mmHg and diastolic 17,062 mmHg. There was a decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressure on day 5 with a value 0,000. </p>
          </sec>
          <sec id="sec-1_1_1_5">
            <title>Conclusions and Recommendations</title>
            <p>Consuming dried tomatoes with Freeze Dryingmethods 55 grams for 14 days is effective for lowering blood pressure in pregnant women with mild gestational hypertension. Expected to be one of the interventions in midwifery care SOPs in pregnant women with mild gestational hypertension so that dry tomatoes can be used as an alternative as a natural therapy that can reduce blood pressure of pregnant women with hypertension in pregnancy</p>
            <p>Keyword: Tomatoes, Blood Pressure, Hypertension in pregnancy.</p>
          </sec>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-1_1_2"/>
        <sec id="sec-1_1_3">
          <title>INTRODUCTION </title>
          <p>Hypertension in pregnancy is a special syndrome, namely the lack of blood flow to each organ due to narrowing and endothelial activity characterized by an increase in blood pressure, usually occurring in pregnancies over 20 weeks. The incidence of hypertension causes 5–10% of complications in pregnancy and is associated with the incidence of maternal mortality (AKI) [1].</p>
          <p>According to WHO data in 2017, maternal mortality rates were recorded at 216 per 100,000 live births. The incidence of hypertension in pregnancy is around 14% in 2015 [2]. In Indonesia, according to the results of the 2015 inter-census survey (SUPAS), the maternal mortality rate was 305 per 100,000 live births, caused by 13% of preeclampsia/ eclampsia [3]. Province of Central Java in 2017 maternal deaths of 88.58 per 100,000 live births and hypertension in pregnancy were the biggest causes of maternal mortality and experienced a percentage increase of 32.97% compared to 2016 which was 27.08% [4]. In Banyumas District, in 2017 there were 54 / 100,000 live births recorded in the year, but in 2018 there were 18 cases with 26,612 live births so that the MMR in 2018 had reached 67.64 / 100,000 live births. Of the 18 cases as many as 10 mothers (55.5%) died due to preeclampsia [5].</p>
          <p>Handling hypertension of pregnant women that has been done so far is by giving medicines such as methyldopa 250 mg and nifedipine 10 mg. But many pharmacological therapies have side effects such as dizziness, nausea, bloating, constipation, depression. The baby will experience Intra Uterine Growth Retardation (IUGR). Therefore, non-pharmacological therapy is very necessary because the natural ingredients used are safe, cause minimum side effects or even have no side effects at all and can improve the body's resistance and are easily obtained [6].</p>
          <p>The administration of 200 mg of tomato juice containing 0.6 grams of potassium and 0.3 grams of flavonoid for 14 days obtained the effect size of cystole 0.144 and diastole 0.325. This shows that tomatoes have better effectiveness compared to other non-pharmacological therapies [7].</p>
          <p>Carotenoid, potassium, omega 3 fatty acids and fiber nutrients can support health and prevent hypertension. The content of vitamin C, beta-carotene, and vitamin E in tomatoes act as antioxidants that can lower blood pressure [8].</p>
          <p>From some of these problems, researchers are interested in conducting research with the title "Alternative Control of Blood Pressure with Tomatoes (Lycopersium Commune) Using the Freeze Drying Method" in Pregnant Women with Hypertension</p>
          <sec id="sec-1_1_3_1">
            <title>Study Objectives</title>
            <p>To prove that dried tomatoes affect the decrease in blood pressure in pregnant women with hypertension.</p>
          </sec>
          <sec id="sec-1_1_3_2">
            <title>Methods</title>
            <p>Quasy Experimentwith pretest and posttest with control group design. The sample amounted to 32 pregnant woman divided intervention and control group. In the intervention group, antenatal care was given and dried tomatoes at a dose of 55 grams for 14 days and patients in the control group were given antenatal care only. Measurement of systolic and diastolic blood pressure were carried out every day as long as research.  </p>
          </sec>
          <sec id="sec-1_1_3_3">
            <title>Data Analysis</title>
            <p>In univariate analysis, the data displayed are frequency distributions of sample characteristics, average values, standard deviations, maximum and minimum values ​​of blood pressure. To see the effect of dried tomatoes on blood pressure bivariate analysis was carried out. The first test carried out was the data normality test for systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, the results obtained p value&gt; 0.05 means that the data are normally distributed, p value &lt;0.05 means that the data is not normally distributed.</p>
          </sec>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-1_1_4">
          <title>RESULT</title>
          <sec id="sec-1_1_4_1">
            <title>Univariat Analysis</title>
            <p>
              <bold>Table 1. Distribution Of Respondent Characteristics Based On Education, Employment, Family History, Past Pregnancy/Childbirth/Postpartum History, And Gestational Age Of Intervention Groups and Control groups</bold>
            </p>
            <table-wrap>
              <table>
                <tr>
                  <td rowspan="2">Characteristics</td>
                  <td colspan="2">Groups</td>
                  <td rowspan="2">
                    <italic>P value</italic>
                  </td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td/>
                  <td>
                    <bold>Intervention (n=16)</bold>
                  </td>
                  <td>
                    <bold>Control (n=16)</bold>
                  </td>
                  <td/>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Education</td>
                  <td/>
                  <td/>
                  <td/>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Primary school</td>
                  <td>31,2 %</td>
                  <td>25 %</td>
                  <td>1,000</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Junior high school</td>
                  <td>12,5 %</td>
                  <td>18,8 %</td>
                  <td/>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Senior High School</td>
                  <td>43,8 %</td>
                  <td>50 %</td>
                  <td/>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>College</td>
                  <td>12,5 %</td>
                  <td>6,2 %</td>
                  <td/>
                </tr>
              </table>
            </table-wrap>
            <table-wrap>
              <table>
                <tr>
                  <td>Work</td>
                  <td/>
                  <td/>
                  <td/>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Work </td>
                  <td>18,8 %</td>
                  <td>18,8 %</td>
                  <td>1,000</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Does not work</td>
                  <td>81,2 %</td>
                  <td>81,2 %</td>
                  <td/>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Family history</td>
                  <td/>
                  <td/>
                  <td/>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>History of father</td>
                  <td>37,5 %</td>
                  <td>31,2 %</td>
                  <td>0,851</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>History of mother</td>
                  <td>12,5 %</td>
                  <td>18,8 %</td>
                  <td/>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Nothing</td>
                  <td>50,0 %</td>
                  <td>50 %</td>
                  <td/>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Past pregnancy/childbirth/ postpartum history</td>
                  <td/>
                  <td/>
                  <td/>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>There</td>
                  <td>12,5 %</td>
                  <td>12,5 %</td>
                  <td>1,000</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Nothing</td>
                  <td>87,5 %</td>
                  <td>87,5 %</td>
                  <td/>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Age of Pregnancy</td>
                  <td/>
                  <td/>
                  <td/>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Gestational age (mean ± SD) Sunday</td>
                  <td>26,69 ± 3,807</td>
                  <td>27,19 ± 5,180</td>
                  <td>0,758</td>
                </tr>
              </table>
            </table-wrap>
            <p>Table 1 explains that the the frequency distribution of respondents' educational characteristics is grouped into 4, namely the elementary, junior high, high school and tertiary groups. The results of the frequency distribution of the intervention group's majority were 43.8% of the last senior secondary education, the control group respondents were also the majority of senior secondary education at 50%. </p>
            <p>The results of the characteristics of respondents based on work are grouped into 2 namely work and not work. The majority of respondents in the intervention group 81.2% did not work, while in the control group the majority did not work at 81.2%.</p>
            <p>The frequency distribution of the history of hypertension characteristics in the family in the intervention group 50% had no history, while in the control group there was no history of hypertension in the family by 50%.</p>
            <p>The results of the intervention group's characteristics were 87.5% with no history of hypertension in pregnancy, childbirth and previous postpartum, whereas in the control group the majority had no history of hypertension in the previous pregnancy, childbirth and postpartum by 87.5%.</p>
            <p>The frequency distribution of respondents' characteristics of gestational age in the intervention group averaged 26.69 weeks, while in the control group the average gestational age was 27.19 weeks.</p>
            <p>After the homogeneity test was obtained, the p value was good for education, employment, family history, past history of pregnancy, childbirth and childbirth, gestational age showed a value of &gt; 0.05 meaning Homogeneous/no significant differences in the characteristics of respondents between the intervention and control groups.</p>
            <fig>
              <graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="png" xlink:href="image2.png"/>
            </fig>
            <p>
              <bold>Figure 1</bold>
              <bold>.</bold>
              <bold> Changes In Mean Systolic Blood Pressure In The Treatment And Control Groups</bold>
            </p>
            <p>Figure 1 above shows that the change in the average systolic blood pressure at pre to day 15 for the intervention group and group experienced a decrease, but in the intervention group there was a more significant decrease compared to the control group.</p>
            <p>
              <bold>Figure 2.</bold>
              <bold> Changes In Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure In The Intervention And Control Groups</bold>
            </p>
            <p>Figure 2 above shows that the change in the average diastolic blood pressure at pre to day 15 for the intervention group and group experienced a decrease, but in the intervention group there was a more significant decrease compared to the control group.</p>
          </sec>
          <sec id="sec-1_1_4_2">
            <title>Bivariate Analysis</title>
            <p>
              <bold>Table 2. The difference In The Value Of Systolic Blood Pressure Between The Intervention </bold>
              <bold>a</bold>
              <bold>nd Control Groups</bold>
            </p>
            <table-wrap>
              <table>
                <tr>
                  <td rowspan="3">Variabel</td>
                  <td colspan="2">Group</td>
                  <td rowspan="3">P value*</td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td/>
                  <td>
                    <bold>Intervensi (n=16)</bold>
                  </td>
                  <td>
                    <bold>Control (n=16)</bold>
                  </td>
                  <td/>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td/>
                  <td>
                    <bold>Mean±SD</bold>
                  </td>
                  <td>
                    <bold>Mean±SD</bold>
                  </td>
                  <td/>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Pre</td>
                  <td>145.38±1.78</td>
                  <td>144.94±2.14</td>
                  <td>0.445<sup>a</sup></td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Post 1</td>
                  <td>145.19±2.13</td>
                  <td>144.5±2.16</td>
                  <td>0.373<sup>b</sup></td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Post 2</td>
                  <td>142.38±2.47</td>
                  <td>142.19±2.34</td>
                  <td>0.827<sup>b</sup></td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Post 3</td>
                  <td>142.25±2.35</td>
                  <td>142.38±2.02</td>
                  <td>0.926<sup>a</sup></td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Post 4</td>
                  <td>141.13±3.24</td>
                  <td>142.63±2.41</td>
                  <td>0.254<sup>b</sup></td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Post 5</td>
                  <td>137.19±2.85</td>
                  <td>141.06±2.54</td>
                  <td>0.000<sup>b</sup></td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Post 6</td>
                  <td>135.88±3.13</td>
                  <td>141.19±2.16</td>
                  <td>0.000<sup>a</sup></td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Post 7</td>
                  <td>135.0±3.86</td>
                  <td>140.13±2.02</td>
                  <td>0.001<sup>a</sup></td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Post 8</td>
                  <td>133.81±2.94</td>
                  <td>140.50±2.55</td>
                  <td>0.000<sup>a</sup></td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Post 9</td>
                  <td>132.81±3.46</td>
                  <td>141.31±2.30</td>
                  <td>0.000<sup>b</sup></td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Post 10</td>
                  <td>131.75±2.81</td>
                  <td>140.75±2.01</td>
                  <td>0.000<sup>a</sup></td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Post 11</td>
                  <td>131.63±3.00</td>
                  <td>141.06±2.38</td>
                  <td>0.000<sup>b</sup></td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Post 12</td>
                  <td>129.75±2.64</td>
                  <td>140.44±26.58</td>
                  <td>0.000<sup>b</sup></td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Post 13</td>
                  <td>129.63±2.55</td>
                  <td>141.06±1.87</td>
                  <td>0.000<sup>a</sup></td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Post 14</td>
                  <td>129.06±2.11</td>
                  <td>140.19±1.83</td>
                  <td>0.000<sup>a</sup></td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Post 15</td>
                  <td>128.56±1.36</td>
                  <td>140.75±1.57</td>
                  <td>0.000<sup>a</sup></td>
                </tr>
              </table>
            </table-wrap>
            <p>Table 2. Results of Repeated Measures Anova shows that the difference in systole blood pressure obtained p value&gt; 0.05, that is at pre-post day 4 means that there is no difference in systolic blood pressure in the treatment and control groups. Whereas after intervention on day 5 the p value of 0,000 &lt;0.05 means that there is a difference in the decrease in systolic blood pressure between the intervention group and the control group.</p>
            <p>
              <bold>Table 3. Differences In Diastolic Blood Pressure Values ​​Between The Intervention And Control Groups</bold>
            </p>
            <table-wrap>
              <table>
                <tr>
                  <td colspan="2" rowspan="3">Variabel</td>
                  <td colspan="3">Group</td>
                  <td/>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td colspan="2"/>
                  <td colspan="2">
                    <bold>Intervensi (n=16)</bold>
                  </td>
                  <td>
                    <bold>Control (n=16)</bold>
                  </td>
                  <td>
                    <bold>P value*</bold>
                  </td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td colspan="2"/>
                  <td colspan="2">
                    <bold>Mean±SD</bold>
                  </td>
                  <td>
                    <bold>Mean±SD</bold>
                  </td>
                  <td/>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Pre</td>
                  <td colspan="2">95±1.59</td>
                  <td colspan="2">95±1.09</td>
                  <td>1.000<sup>b</sup></td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Post 1</td>
                  <td colspan="2">94.06±1.80</td>
                  <td colspan="2">94.69±1.35</td>
                  <td>0.277<sup>b</sup></td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Post 2</td>
                  <td colspan="2">91.88±2.47</td>
                  <td colspan="2">93.44±1.93</td>
                  <td>0.056<sup>b</sup></td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Post 3</td>
                  <td colspan="2">90.81±2.45</td>
                  <td colspan="2">92.44±1.93</td>
                  <td>0.056<sup>b</sup></td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Post 4</td>
                  <td colspan="2">89.88±2.41</td>
                  <td colspan="2">90.69±1.40</td>
                  <td>0.184<sup>a</sup></td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Post 5</td>
                  <td colspan="2">87.69±2.84</td>
                  <td colspan="2">91.13±1.82</td>
                  <td>0.000<sup>a</sup></td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Post 6</td>
                  <td colspan="2">86.31±2.49</td>
                  <td colspan="2">90.69±2.52</td>
                  <td>0.000<sup>a</sup></td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Post 7</td>
                  <td colspan="2">85.56±2.68</td>
                  <td colspan="2">90.13±2.24</td>
                  <td>0.000<sup>b</sup></td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Post 8</td>
                  <td colspan="2">84.13±2.94</td>
                  <td colspan="2">90.19±2.25</td>
                  <td>0.000<sup>b</sup></td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Post 9</td>
                  <td colspan="2">83.63±2.50</td>
                  <td colspan="2">90.88±2.06</td>
                  <td>0.000<sup>b</sup></td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Post 10</td>
                  <td colspan="2">82.75±2.51</td>
                  <td colspan="2">91.50±1.86</td>
                  <td>0.000<sup>a</sup></td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Post 11</td>
                  <td colspan="2">81.88±2.80</td>
                  <td colspan="2">91.13±1.70</td>
                  <td>0.000<sup>a</sup></td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Post 12</td>
                  <td colspan="2">80.63±2.50</td>
                  <td colspan="2">91.25±1.61</td>
                  <td>0.000<sup>a</sup></td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Post 13</td>
                  <td colspan="2">79.38±2.24</td>
                  <td colspan="2">90.63±1.85</td>
                  <td>0.000<sup>b</sup></td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Post 14</td>
                  <td colspan="2">79.06±2.35</td>
                  <td colspan="2">91.31±1.13</td>
                  <td>0.000<sup>a</sup></td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                  <td>Post 15</td>
                  <td colspan="2">77.94±2.14</td>
                  <td colspan="2">91.56±0.72</td>
                  <td>0.000<sup>a</sup></td>
                </tr>
              </table>
            </table-wrap>
            <p>The results of the analysis of diastolic blood pressure differences obtained p value&gt; 0.05, that is at pre-post 4, meaning that there was no difference in diastolic blood pressure in the treatment and control groups. Whereas after treatment on day 5-15 the value of p value &lt;0.05 means that there are significant differences in diastolic blood pressure in the intervention group and the control group.</p>
          </sec>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-1_1_5">
          <title>DISCUSSION</title>
          <p>Tomatoes that contain potassium and lycopene (antioxidants) are very important to control blood pressure. Potassium plays a role in inhibiting renin secretion by increasing excretion of sodium and water. Circulation of renin in the blood and function by catalyzing changes in angiotensin to angiotensin I. With the help of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE). angiotensin I changes to its active form, angiotensin II. Sodium and water retention will decrease with the presence of potassium so that plasma volume decreases, cardiac output and peripheral pressure also decrease so that blood pressure will also decrease [9].</p>
          <p>Decrease in aldosterone secretion will reduce sodium in urine and water as a vasodilator in regulating blood pressure by inhibiting reabsorption of sodium in the proximal renal tube, preventing the narrowing of capillary walls and arteries which causes blood pressure to increase and suppress renin secretion as an inhibitor of vascular smooth muscle contractions. With a decrease in membrane potential it will cause blood vessel muscles to relax so that blood pressure will decrease [9].</p>
          <p>Comparison with previous research, one of which is Theresia Anita by giving 200 grams of tomato juice/day containing 0.6 grams of potassium and 0.3 grams of flavonoids showing a decrease in systolic blood pressure [7]. This shows that the administration of dried tomatoes is more significant in lowering blood pressure compared to tomato juice, because dried tomatoes at a dose of 55 grams contain 980 mg of potassium and lycopene 48,619 mg.</p>
          <p>In a study conducted by Beata Krasinka et al, tomato extract was used as a preventive therapy for blood clotting which could result in hypertension and heart disease. The results showed that after administration of tomato extract as much as 213 mg / day and Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) can reduce systolic and diastolic blood pressure [10].</p>
          <p>Research conducted by Mineka Yoshimura et al, tomatoes have the effect of gamma amino butyric acid (GABA) which can reduce blood pressure in mice with hypertension. Giving dry tomatoes at a dose of 10 grams / kg body weight (containing 17.9 mg GABA) significantly lowered blood pressure at 4-6 hours after administration compared to a dose of 2 grams / kg body weight (containing 3.6 mg GABA) which gave antihypertensive effects at 6-8 hours after administration [11].</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-1_1_6">
          <title>CONCLUSIONS</title>
          <p>Giving dried tomatoes with freeze drying method as much as 55 grams / day is effective for reducing systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure in pregnant women with mild gestational hypertension.</p>
          <sec id="sec-1_1_6_1">
            <title>Recommendation Future</title>
            <p>Expected to be one of the interventions in midwifery care SOPs in pregnant women with mild gestational hypertension so that dry tomatoes can be used as an alternative as a natural therapy that can reduce blood pressure of pregnant women with hypertension in pregnancy</p>
          </sec>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-1_1_7">
          <title>REFERENCES</title>
          <list list-type="bullet">
            <list-item>
              <p>Hipertensi Dalam Kehamilan Dalam Ilmu Kebidanan. 4th ed. Jakarta: Bina Pustaka Sarwono Prawirohardjo; 2013.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>World Health Organization. World Health Statistics. 2017: Monitoring Health for the SDGs 2017.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>Indonesia KKR, Profil Kesehatan Indonesia tahun 2016. Indonesia: Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia 2017.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>Dinas Kesehatan Jawa Tengah. Profil Kesehatan Jateng. 3511351(24), 2016.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>Dinas Kesehatan . Profil Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten Banyumas Tahun 2017.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>Pereira Alexander RA, Velho APM, Cortez DAG, Szerwieski LLD, Cortez LER. Traditional use of medicinal plants by elderly. Rev da Rede Enferm do Nord. 17(3), 2016, 427-434.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>Anita Theresia, Suwandono A, Ariyanti I, Pramono N, Kumorowulan S. Effect Of Consuming Tomatto (Lycopersium Commune) Juice in Lowering Blood Pressure in Pregnant Mother With Hypertension. 3(6), 2017, 707-711.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>Hernayanti. Likopen dalam tomat sebagai antiinflamasi dan antinefrotoksisitas pada tikus putih terpapar kadmium. 2017, 615-622.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>Biswas Dipanker, Uddin MM, Dizdarevic LL, Jørgensen A, Duttaroy AK. Inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme by aqueous extract of tomato. Europe Journal  Nutrion. 53(8), 2014, 1699-1706.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>Beata Krasińska, Angelika Osińska, Aleksandra Krasińska. Favourable hypotensive effect after standardised tomato extract treatment in hypertensive subjects at high cardiovascular risk: a randomised controlled trial. 2017.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>Mineka Yoshimura, Tohru Toyohsi. Antihypertensive Effect of a γ-Aminobutyric Acid Rich Tomato Cultivar ‘DG03-9’ in Spontaneously.</p>
            </list-item>
          </list>
        </sec>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back/>
</article>
