<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Comparative analysis of phytochemical, antibacterial and antioxidant activity of different extracts of azadirachtaindicaleaves</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group content-type="author">
        <contrib contrib-type="person">
          <name>
            <given-names>MeenakshiBhardwaj</given-names>
          </name>
          <email>rmaninder11@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff-1">
        <institution>Department of Microbiology, Pt. JawaharLal Nehru Govt. Medical College and Hospital Chamba, Himachal Pradesh, India</institution>
        <country>India</country>
      </aff>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2020-08-09">
          <day>09</day>
          <month>08</month>
          <year>2020</year>
        </date>
        <date data-type="published" iso-8601-date="2020-08-09">
          <day>09</day>
          <month>08</month>
          <year>2020</year>
        </date>
      </history>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <fig>
      <graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="jpeg" xlink:href="image1.jpeg"/>
    </fig>
    <p>
      <bold>
        <italic>IJAMSCR |Volume </italic>
      </bold>
      <bold>
        <italic>5</italic>
      </bold>
      <bold>
        <italic> | Issue </italic>
      </bold>
      <bold>
        <italic>4</italic>
      </bold>
      <bold>
        <italic> | </italic>
      </bold>
      <bold>
        <italic>Oct</italic>
      </bold>
      <bold>
        <italic>-</italic>
      </bold>
      <bold>
        <italic>Dec</italic>
      </bold>
      <bold>
        <italic>–</italic>
      </bold>
      <bold>
        <italic> 201</italic>
      </bold>
      <bold>
        <italic>7</italic>
      </bold>
    </p>
    <p>
      <bold>www.ijamscr.com</bold>
    </p>
    <p><bold><italic>Research article                                                                                               Medical research</italic></bold></p>
    <p>
      <bold>Comparative analysis of phytochemical, antibacterial and antioxidant activity of different extracts of </bold>
      <bold>
        <italic>azadirachtaindica</italic>
      </bold>
      <bold>leaves</bold>
    </p>
    <p>
      <bold>MeenakshiBhardwaj</bold>
      <bold>*</bold>
      <bold>
        <sup>1</sup>
      </bold>
      <bold>,</bold>
      <bold>Maninder</bold>
      <bold> Singh</bold>
      <bold>
        <sup>2</sup>
      </bold>
      <bold> and </bold>
      <bold>G.M. Lone</bold>
      <bold>
        <sup>3</sup>
      </bold>
      <bold> Kamal Dev</bold>
      <bold>
        <sup>4</sup>
      </bold>
    </p>
    <p>
      <italic>
        <sup>1</sup>
      </italic>
      <italic>Department of Microbiology, Pt. </italic>
      <italic>JawaharLal</italic>
      <italic> Nehru Govt. Medical College and Hospital </italic>
      <italic>Chamba</italic>
      <italic>, Himachal Pradesh, India</italic>
    </p>
    <p>
      <italic>
        <sup>2</sup>
      </italic>
      <italic>Department of Pharmacology, Pt. </italic>
      <italic>JawaharLal</italic>
      <italic> Nehru Govt. Medical College and Hospital, </italic>
      <italic>Chamba</italic>
      <italic>, Himachal Pradesh, India</italic>
    </p>
    <p>
      <italic>
        <sup>3</sup>
      </italic>
      <italic>Department of pharmacology, Pt. </italic>
      <italic>JawaharLal</italic>
      <italic> Nehru Govt. Medical College and Hospital, </italic>
      <italic>Chamba</italic>
      <italic>, Himachal Pradesh, India</italic>
    </p>
    <p><bold>*Corresponding Author</bold>: <bold>MeenakshiBhardwaj</bold></p>
    <p>
      <bold>Email id: rmaninder11@gmail.com</bold>
    </p>
    <p>
      <bold>ABSTRACT</bold>
    </p>
    <p>
      <bold>Introduction</bold>
    </p>
    <p>The present study was designed to compare phytochemicals, antimicrobial and antioxidant activity of different extracts of leaves of <italic>Azardirachtaindica</italic> from Himachal Pradesh. In this study, different extracts of <italic>Azadirachtaindica</italic> leaves are screened for the occurrence of bioactive compounds. </p>
    <p>
      <bold>Objectives</bold>
    </p>
    <p>Analysis of Phytochemicals in various extracts of <italic>Azadirachtaindica</italic>leaves.</p>
    <p>Comparative evaluation of antibacterial and antioxidant activity of various extracts of <italic>Azadirachtaindica</italic>leaves against<italic>E.coli</italic>and<italic>S.aureus</italic><bold><italic>.</italic></bold>using<italic>DPPH</italic>radical scavenging assay.</p>
    <p>
      <bold>Material &amp; Methods</bold>
    </p>
    <p>The disc diffusion method was used to detect antibacterial activity of different extracts of <italic>Azadirachtaindica</italic>leaves against gram positive and gram negative bacteria such as <italic>S. </italic><italic>aureus</italic><italic>,</italic> and<italic> E. coli respectively</italic>. The methanolic extract showed the more antibacterial and antioxidant activity as compared to that of other extracts. DPPH free radical scavenging assay was performed to check antioxidant potential of <italic>A. </italic><italic>indiaca</italic>. Phytochemical screening of different extracts showed the presence of flavonoids, tannins, phenols, alkaloid, protein/amino acid, carbohydrates and steroids in different extracts of the <italic>A. </italic><italic>indica</italic> leaves. </p>
    <p>
      <bold>Results</bold>
    </p>
    <p>The findings suggested that phytochemicals present in <italic>A. </italic><italic>indica</italic> leavesare potentially beneficial as therapeutic and antioxidative agents in pharmaceuticals, medicinal and food industries. </p>
    <p><bold>Keywords:</bold><italic>Azadirachtaindica</italic>, methanol extract, Chloroform extract, Ethyl acetate extract, Aqueous extract, Antimicrobial activity,<italic> S. </italic><italic>aureus</italic><italic>, E. coli, </italic>DPPH.</p>
    <sec id="sec-1"/>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>
        <bold>INTRODUCTION</bold>
      </title>
      <p>Azadirachtaindica (Neem) is a fast growing evergreen popular tree of meliaceae family found in most tropical countries like India, Africa, America [1]. It has been used in Ayurvedic medicine for more than 4000 years due to its medicinal properties. Neem is called “arista” in Sanskrit,a word that means ‘perfect’, complete and imperishable [2]. The tree is regarded as “village dispensary” in India.  The importance of the neem tree has been recognized by the US National Academy of Science, which publish a report in 1992 entitled “Neem- a tree for solving global problems” [3]. It possesses maximum useful non-wood products (leaves, fruits, bark, flowers, seed, gum, oil, and neem cake) than any otherspecies. It is known to have Antiallergenic, antidermatic, antifeedant, antifungal, antiinflammatory, antipyorrhoeic, antiscabic, cardiac, diuretic, insecticidal, larvicidal, nematicidal, spermicidal and other biological activities. Quercetin and ß-sitosterolwerefirstpolyphenolic flavonoids purified from fresh leaves of neem and were known to have antifungal and antibacterial activities. Numerous biological and pharmacological activities have been reported including antibacterial [4], antifungal [Kher and Chaurasia 1997] and anti-inflammatory. Earlier investigators have confirmedtheir role as anti-inflammatory, antiarthritic, antipyretic, hypoglycemic, antigastric ulcer, antifungal, antibacterial, andante tumour activities [5].</p>
      <p>Azadirachtaindica is considered harmless to human, animal, birds, beneficial insects and earthworms and has been approved by the US Environment Protection Agency for use on food crops [6]. Biological active compound isolated from different parts of the plant include: azadirachtin, meliacin, gedunin, salanin, nimbin,valassinand many other derivatives of these principles. Each part of the neem tree has some medicinal property and is thus commercially exploitable. Several pharmacological activities and medicinal applications of various parts of neem are well known. Cyclic trisulphide and tetrasulphide isolated from the steam distillate of fresh, matured neem leaves have antifungal activity against trichophytonmentagrophytes. </p>
      <p>It has been accepted that drugs based on allopathy are expensive and also exhibit toxic effect on normal tissues and on various biological activities. It is largely accepted fact that numerous pharmacologically active drugs are derived from natural resources including medicinal plants [7]. <italic>Azadirachtaindica</italic>has complex of various constituents including nimbin, nimbidin, nimbolide, and limonoids and such types of ingredients play role in diseases management through modulation of various genetic pathway sand other activities. Quercetin and β-sitosterol were first polyphenolic flavonoids purified from fresh leaves of neem and were known to have antifungal and antibacterial activities [8]. Numerous biological and pharmacological activities have been reported including antibacterial [4], antifungal [9] and anti-inflammatory. Leaf and bark extracts of <italic>A. </italic><italic>indica</italic>have been studied for their antioxidant activity and results of the study clearly indicated that all the tested leaf and bark extracts/fractions of neem grown in the foothills have significant antioxidant properties [10]. </p>
      <p>A study confirmed that ethanolic fraction of neem leaf (EFNL) treatment effectively up regulated the pro-apoptoticgenes and proteins including p53, Bcl-2-associated Xprotein (Bax), Bcl-2-associated death promoter protein (Bad) caspases, phosphatase and tensin homolog gene (pTEN),and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK<sup>) </sup>[11]. </p>
      <p>A methanol extract of the leaves exerts antipyretic effect in male rabbits [12]. The plant also possesses analgesic activity mediated through opioid receptors in laboratory animals.</p>
      <p>The aqueous extract of leaf also possesses potent immune stimulant activity as evidenced by bothhumoral and cell-mediated responses [13]. Leaf extract at100 mg/kg after three weeks of oral administration causes higher IgM and IgG levels along with increased titer of anti albumin antibody [14].</p>
      <p>Aqueous extract of neem leaves significantly decreases blood sugar level and prevents adrenaline as well as glucose-induced hyperglycaemia [15]. The aqueous leaf extract when orally fed, also produceshypoglycaemia in normal rats and decreased blood glucose levels in experimentally-induced diabetes in rats [16]. Neem leaf aqueous extract produces antiulcer effect in rats exposed to restraint – cold stressor ethanol orally by preventing mucus depletion and mast cell degranulation [17]. </p>
      <p>Oral administration of aqueous extract of Neem leaf shows anti-fertility effect in mice [18]. Neemseed and leaf extracts are effective against malarial parasites [19]</p>
      <p>In the present work, we have tried to analyses various extracts from <italic>azadirachtaindica</italic> leaves for its phytochemical, antibacterial and antioxidant activity. The aim of phytochemical screening is to confirm the presence of various constituents for assessing their biological activity or medicinal use. Comparative evaluation of antibacterial activity of various extracts of <italic>Azadirachtaindica</italic>leaves against <italic>E.coli</italic>and <italic>S.aureus</italic><bold><italic>. </italic></bold>Comparative evaluation of antioxidant activity in various <italic>extracts of </italic><italic>Azadirachtaindica</italic>leaves using <italic>DPPH </italic>radical scavenging assay.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>
        <bold>MATERIALS AND METHODS</bold>
      </title>
      <sec id="sec-3_1">
        <title>
          <bold>Materials</bold>
        </title>
        <p><italic>Azadirachtaindica</italic> leaves, HgCl<sub>2, </sub>methnol, ethyl acetate, chloroform, DMSO, Bacterial strain (<italic>Staphylococcus </italic><italic>aureus</italic><italic>, </italic><italic>Eschericia</italic><italic>. Coli</italic>), Ampicillin, Nutrient agar.Fehling reagent, millon reagent</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3_2">
        <title>
          <bold>Sample Collection</bold>
        </title>
        <p><italic>A. </italic><italic>indica</italic> leaves were collected from Bilaspur district of Himachal Pradesh in the month of January 2016.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3_3">
        <title>
          <bold>Washing and Drying</bold>
        </title>
        <p>Leaves were washed thoroughly with distilled water and surface sterilized with 0.1% HgCl<sub>2</sub>and then air dried for 4-5 days.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3_4">
        <title>
          <bold>Grinding and Preparation of extracts</bold>
        </title>
        <p><italic>A. </italic><italic>indica</italic>leave<italic>s</italic>were ground into fine powder using mortor and pestle. To 10 g of <italic>A.indica</italic>leaves powder were soaked in 100 ml methanol, ethyl acetate and chloroform separately and kept on shaker for 3-4 days. The extracts were then filtered through whatman filter paper and filterate were collected in a china dish. The filtrates were dried by evaporates and dissolved in DMSO (100 mg/ml).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3_5">
        <title>
          <bold>Preparation of the aqueous extract</bold>
        </title>
        <p>The aqueous extract was prepared according to Sripanidkulchai<italic>et</italic><italic> al.</italic><italic>,</italic>(2000), with the slight changes. 5g of <italic>A. </italic><italic>indica</italic>powder was boiled in 80 ml distilled water for 2-3 hours. Then solution was filtered through a whatman filter paper and filtrate was collected in a Petri dish.  The filtrate was evaporated by heating over the hot plate at temperature 60º C for 2-3 hours. The weight of the crude extract was recorded. The crude extract dissolved in the DMSO at concentration of 100 mg/ml.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3_6">
        <title>
          <bold>Bacterial strains and Antibiotic used</bold>
        </title>
        <p>Two bacterial strains were used in this study-one gram positive (<italic>Staphylococcus </italic><italic>aureus</italic><italic>) </italic>and one gram negative (<italic>Eschericia</italic><italic>. coli). </italic>Both the strains were obtained from Yeast Biology Lab, Shoolini University, Solan. Pure cultures were maintained on nutrient agar plates and stored at 4°C. Ampicillin (100µg/ml) was used in this study.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3_7">
        <title>
          <bold>Preparation of inoculum</bold>
        </title>
        <p>Bacterial suspensions were prepared from over night cultures by the direct colony method. Colonies were taken directlyfrom the plate and suspended into 1 ml of sterile 0.85% saline. The turbidity of initial suspension was adjusted comparing with 0.5 McFarland Standard which is equivalent to 10<sup>8</sup>colony forming units (CFU)/ml. Bacterial lawn was spread on nutrient agar plates using a sterile cotton swab.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3_8">
        <title>
          <bold>Antimicrobial </bold>
          <bold>susceptivity</bold>
          <bold> test</bold>
        </title>
        <p>The qualitative antimicrobial activity of different extracts of <italic>A. </italic><italic>indica</italic><italic> leaves </italic>were performed by using well diffusion method (Felten<italic>et</italic><italic> al., </italic>2002).50 µlof plant extracts (50µg) were poured into 6mm well. 10 µl ampicillin of concentration 100 µg/ml was used as a positive control and DMSO (solvent) was taken as a negative control. The plates were kept in the incubator at 37°C aerobically for 18 hours. The inhibition zones obtained around the disc were measured using HI Antibiotic Zone Scale-C.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>
        <bold>PHYTOCHEMICAL TESTS (QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS)</bold>
      </title>
      <sec id="sec-4_1">
        <title>
          <bold>Detection of </bold>
          <bold>phenolics</bold>
          <bold>(</bold>
          <bold>Ferric Chloride Test)</bold>
        </title>
        <p>Ferric chloride is acidic in nature; it produces H<sub>3</sub>O<sup>+</sup>ions when dissolved in water. Compounds with a phenol group will form a blue, violet, purple, green, or red-brown colour upon addition of aqueous ferric chloride. Extracts were treated with 3-4 drops of 5% ferric chloride solution. The appearance of bluish or greenish black coloration indicates the presence of pyrogallol or catechol tannins. Formation of bluish black colour indicates the presence of phenols.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4_2">
        <title>
          <bold>Detection of flavonoids </bold>
          <bold>(</bold>
          <bold>Lead acetate Test)</bold>
        </title>
        <p>The conjugation in flavonoid compounds produces a yellow colour, while the extended conjugation in the resultant anthocyanidin shifts the colour further out to the red region of the visible spectrum. The dramatic change in colour makes this a simple visual test for the presence of flavones. Extracts were treated with few drops of 10% lead acetate solution. Formation of yellow colour precipitate indicated the presence of flavonoids<bold>.</bold></p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4_3">
        <title>
          <bold>Detection</bold>
          <bold> of carbohydrates </bold>
          <bold>(</bold>
          <bold>Fehling’s test)</bold>
        </title>
        <p>Fehling’s solution contains blue alkaline cupric hydroxide solution, which upon heating with plant extract gets reduced to yellow or red cuprous oxide. Extracts were treated with 2-3drops of Fehling reagent and heated to 10 minutes. Appearance of red colour precipitate indicated the presence of reducing sugars.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4_4">
        <title>
          <bold>Detection of alkaloids </bold>
          <bold>(</bold>
          <bold>Mayer’s Test)</bold>
        </title>
        <p>Mercury salt reacts with the lone pairs of nitrogen that are present, then the typical off-white precipitate falls out. An uncharged mercury salt is, thus obtained. Extracts were dissolved individually in dilute hydrochloric acid and filtered. Filtrates were treated with 2-3 drops of Mayer’s reagent (Potassium Mercuric Iodide). Formation of a yellow coloured precipitate indicated the presence of alkaloids.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4_5">
        <title>
          <bold>Detection of Proteins (</bold>
          <bold>Millon</bold>
          <bold> test) and amino acids (</bold>
          <bold>xanthoprotein</bold>
          <bold> test)</bold>
        </title>
        <p>The reaction is due to the presence of the hydroxyphenyl group, C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>5</sub>OH in the amino acid molecule; and any phenolic compound which is unsubstituted in the 3,5 positions such as tyrosine, phenol and thymol will give the reaction. Solutions of nitric acid containing mercuric nitrate reacts with phenols, producing red colours or yellow precipitates which react with nitric acid to form red solution. The reaction probably depends on the formation of a nitro compound; which then reacts with phenol.20 µl of millon reagent was added to the test tube containing 1ml of extract and then heated in water bath for 10 minutes. The samples were cooled and 10µl of 1% sodium nitrite solution. Red colour indicated the presence of proteins.</p>
        <p>Xanthoprotein test gives positive results with proteins, peptones, peptides, amino acids and other primary amines, including ammonia. Proline and hydroxyproline give yellow colour with ninhydrin, while other acids give blue to purple colour.4-5 drops of 0.1% ninhydrin solution were added to 1ml of extract. Purple colour indicated the presence of amino acids.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4_6">
        <title>
          <bold>Detection of </bold>
          <bold>triterpenoids</bold>
          <bold> (</bold>
          <bold>Salkowski’s</bold>
          <bold> Test)</bold>
        </title>
        <p>Salkowski’stest detect presence of cholestrol. Presence of double bond in one cholestrol ring is responsible for its ability to form coloured product in the presence of concentrated inorganic acid and it should yield a layering of colour. Extracts were treated with chloroform and filtered. The filtrates were treated with few drops of concentrated Sulphuric acid, shaken and allowed to stand. Appearance of golden yellow colour indicated the presence of triterpenes.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4_7">
        <title>
          <bold>ANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITY (DPPH RADICAL SCAVENGING ASSAY)</bold>
        </title>
        <p>The DPPH radical scavenging assay of various extracts of <italic>A. </italic><italic>indica</italic>was conducted (Shah<italic>et</italic><italic> al.,</italic> 2013). In this method, 900 μl of 0.1 mM DPPH solution (prepared inethanol) was mixed with 100 μl of methanolic, ethyl acetate, chloroform and aqueous extracts of <italic>A.indica</italic>ranging from 2.5-20 μg/ml. The reaction mixture was shaken and incubated in the dark at room temperature for 30 min, and the absorbance was read at 517 nm against the blank. Ascorbic acid was used as standard. DPPH radical scavenging activity was calculated from the following equation-</p>
        <p>DPPH radical scavenging activity (%) =1-A<sub>s</sub>/A<sub>c</sub>×100</p>
        <p>Where A<sub>c</sub>-Absorbance of control, As-Absorbance of test sample.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>
        <bold>RESULTS</bold>
      </title>
      <sec id="sec-5_1">
        <title>
          <bold>Extract yield</bold>
        </title>
        <p>The yield obtained of the different extracts was shown in. </p>
        <p>
          <bold>Table -1: Percentage Yield of different extracts of </bold>
          <bold>
            <italic>A. </italic>
          </bold>
          <bold>
            <italic>indica</italic>
          </bold>
          <bold>leaves.</bold>
          <bold>Maximum yield </bold>
          <bold>was </bold>
          <bold>obtained with ethyl acetate followed by methanol and water.</bold>
        </p>
        <table-wrap>
          <table>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>S. No</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Extracts</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Weight of extracts(mg) </bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Percentage Yield (%)</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>1.</td>
              <td>Aqueous</td>
              <td>95mg</td>
              <td>1.9</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>2.</td>
              <td>Methanol</td>
              <td>200mg</td>
              <td>2</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>3.</td>
              <td>Chloroform</td>
              <td>60mg</td>
              <td>0.6</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>4.</td>
              <td>Ethyl acetate</td>
              <td>530mg</td>
              <td>5.3</td>
            </tr>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>The result showed that the yield of ethyl acetate extract was higher than other extracts. Fig. 1</p>
        <fig>
          <graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="png" xlink:href="image2.png"/>
        </fig>
        <p>
          <bold>Extracts of </bold>
          <bold>
            <italic>A. </italic>
          </bold>
          <bold>
            <italic>indica</italic>
          </bold>
          <bold> leaves:  A. Methanol extract; B. Chloroform extract; C. Ethyl acetate extract; </bold>
        </p>
        <p>
          <bold>D. Aqueous extract.</bold>
        </p>
        <p>It may be due to the different polarity of the solvents used.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5_2">
        <title>
          <bold>Analysis of Phytochemicals in various extracts of </bold>
          <bold>
            <italic>Azadirachtaindica</italic>
          </bold>
          <bold>leaves</bold>
        </title>
        <p>The screening of phytochemicals was done in all the four extracts by performing various tests as listed in materials and method section.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5_3">
        <title>
          <bold>Test for </bold>
          <bold>phenolics</bold>
        </title>
        <p>The ferric chloride test formation of greenish black colour revealed that phenolics were present inthe methanol, ethyl acetate and aqueous extracts.The chloroform extract did not reveal presence of phenolics.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5_4">
        <title>
          <bold>Tests for flavonoids</bold>
        </title>
        <p>Inthe lead acetate test formation of yellow precipitate revealed that flavonoids are present in all the extracts (fig. 4.3). Control contains lead acetate. The yellow precipitate was detected in all the extracts.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5_5">
        <title>
          <bold>Test for carbohydrates</bold>
        </title>
        <p>The Fehling’s test for carbohydrates revealed the presence of reducing sugars in aqueous, methanol and ethyl acetate extracts, whereas chloroform extract showed absence of carbohydrate. Formation of green or red colour indicated the presence of reducing sugar (Fig. 4.3). </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5_6">
        <title>
          <bold>Test for alkaloids</bold>
        </title>
        <p>The Mayer’s test for alkaloids revealed that aqueous, methanol, chloroform, ethyl acetateand crude methanolshow presence of alkaloids (Fig. 4.4).In this (A) is control which contain only reagent. In all extracts, yellow colour precipitate or turbidity was observed. Formation of yellow colourindicatedpresence of alkaloids.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5_7">
        <title>
          <bold>Ninhydrin</bold>
          <bold> test</bold>
        </title>
        <p>Formation of yellow colour in the ethyl acetate extract revealed the presence of amino acids. The control in the contains the conc. HNO<sub>3</sub>. The yellow colour was absent in the aqueous, methanoland chloroform extract, showing the absence of amino acids.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5_8">
        <title>
          <bold>Tests for </bold>
          <bold>triterpenoids</bold>
        </title>
        <p>In salkowski’s test, formation of reddish brown colour revealed that triterpenoids were present in all the extracts. Reddish brown colour was formed in the aqueous, methanol, chloroform and ethyl acetate extract of <italic>A. </italic><italic>indica</italic>leaves.</p>
        <p>The result showed that various phytochemicals were present in the aqueous, methanol, chloroform and ethyl acetate extract.  Alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids were present in all the four extracts. Tannins were absent in the ethyl acetate extract and phenols were only present in the ethyl acetate extract. Sterols and phlobatannins were absent in all the four extracts. Saponins were only present in the aqueous extract and amino acids were only present in the ethyl acetate extract. “++” indicates the more intense colour as compared to other extracts.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5_9">
        <title>
          <bold>Comparative evaluation of antibacterial activity of various extracts of </bold>
          <bold>
            <italic>azadirachtaindicaleaves</italic>
          </bold>
          <bold>against</bold>
          <bold>
            <italic>E.coli</italic>
          </bold>
          <bold>and</bold>
          <bold>
            <italic>s.aureus</italic>
          </bold>
        </title>
        <p>The antimicrobial activity of different extracts of <italic>A.indica</italic> was tested against the <italic>S.aureus</italic> and <italic>E.coli</italic> bacteria. The zone of inhibition against <italic>S.aureus</italic> was 19.5 mm for methanol extract, 11.5 mm for ethyl acetate extract and of 13 mm for aqueous extract, chloroform extracts showed no zone of inhibition. The ampicillin (+ve control) showed the inhibition zone of 30 mm. DMSO (-ve control) showed no zone against the <italic>S.aureus</italic>. In case <italic>of </italic><italic>E.coli</italic>bacteria, zone of inhibition of 18.5 mm was observed for methanol extract, 10 mm for ethyl acetate extract and of 9 mm for aqueous extract. Chloroform extract showed no zone of inhibition. The ampicillin (+ve control) showed the inhibition zone of 10 mm. DMSO (negative control) showed no zone of inhibition.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5_10">
        <title>
          <bold>Comparative antibacterial activity of different extracts of </bold>
          <bold>
            <italic>A. </italic>
          </bold>
          <bold>
            <italic>Indica</italic>
          </bold>
          <bold> leaves</bold>
        </title>
        <p>In the present study, we found that methanolic extract of <italic>A.indica</italic> leaves showed more antibacterial activity as compared to that of chloroform, ethyl acetate and aqueous extracts. The increasing order of antibacterial activity against <italic>S.aureus</italic> is<italic> – </italic>Ethyl acetate ˂ aqueous extract˂Methanolic extract, while in case of <italic>E. coli, </italic>aqueous extract˂ Ethyl acetate˂Methanolic extract.</p>
        <fig>
          <graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="png" xlink:href="image3.png"/>
        </fig>
        <p>
          <bold>Fig</bold>
          <bold>-</bold>
          <bold>2</bold>
          <bold> Comparative antibacterial activity of different extracts of </bold>
          <bold>
            <italic>A. </italic>
          </bold>
          <bold>
            <italic>indica</italic>
          </bold>
          <bold> leaves</bold>
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5_11"/>
      <sec id="sec-5_12"/>
      <sec id="sec-5_13">
        <title>
          <bold>
            <italic>In vitro</italic>
          </bold>
          <bold> antioxidant activity</bold>
        </title>
        <p><italic>A. </italic><italic>indica</italic>leaves extract exhibited good antioxidant activities in comparison to ascorbic acid. IC<sub>50</sub> value (half maximal inhibitory concentration) indicates how much of a particular drug or other substance is required to inhibit a given biological process.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5_14">
        <title>
          <bold>DPPH radical scavenging activity</bold>
        </title>
        <p>In DPPH (1, 1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl) radical scavenging activity the results showed that percentage inhibition increased with increasing concentration from 2.5µg/ml to 10 µg/ml. DPPH antioxidant assay is based on the ability of a stable free radical, to decolorize in the presence of antioxidants. The DPPH radical contains an odd electron at 517 nm and is visible with deep purple color. When DPPH accepts an electron donated by an antioxidant compound, it is decolorized and can be quantitatively measured from the changes in the absorbance. Free radical scavenging effect of the corresponding different <italic>A.indica</italic> extracts of methanol, chloroform, ethylacetate and aqueous extracts were determined spectrophotometrically at 517nm.Ascorbic acid was used as standard free radical scavenger reference compound.</p>
        <p>DPPH radical scavenging activity (%) =1-A<sub>s</sub>/A<sub>c</sub>×100</p>
        <p>Where A<sub>c</sub>-Absorbance of control, As-Absorbance of test sample.</p>
        <p>IC<sub>50 </sub>value is a measure of the effectiveness of substance in inhibiting a specific biological or biochemical function. The IC<sub>50</sub> is the concentration of an inhibitor where the response (or binding) is reduced by half. The IC<sub>50 </sub>is the concentration of an inhibitor where the response or binding) is reduced by half. In the present study, the different extracts of <italic>A. </italic><italic>indica</italic> had significant scavenging effect on the DPPH radical which was generally significantly increasing with the increase in the concentration (Fig-3) </p>
        <p>
          <bold>Fig</bold>
          <bold>-</bold>
          <bold>3</bold>
          <bold> DPPH radical scavenging activity of methanol, chloroform, ethyl acetate and aqueous extracts of </bold>
          <bold>
            <italic>A. </italic>
          </bold>
          <bold>
            <italic>indica</italic>
          </bold>
          <bold> leaves</bold>
          <bold>
            <italic>.</italic>
          </bold>
        </p>
        <p>Methanolic extract of <italic>A. </italic><italic>indica</italic> leaves showed comparable antioxidant activity with ‘ascorbic acid’. In general antioxidant activity of methanolic extracts was higher than that of chloroform, ethyl acetate and aqueous extracts.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6"/>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>
        <bold>DISCUSSION</bold>
      </title>
      <p>Many of the existing synthetic drugs cause various side effects. Hence, natural plant based drug compounds could be useful in meeting this demand for newer drugs with minimal side effects. <italic>A. </italic><italic>indica</italic> leaves possessed good antibacterial activity confirming the great potential of bioactive compounds and is useful for rationalizing the use of this plant in primary health care. In the present work, we elucidated that different extracts of <italic>A. </italic><italic>indica</italic> have antimicrobial activity and contains various phytochemicals and antioxidant activity. The aim of phytochemical screening is to confirm the presence of various constituents for assessing their biological activity or medicinal use. The most important of these are alkaloids, saponins, steroids, phenols, flavonoids and tannins. Preliminary phytochemical screening of methanolic, chloroform, ethyl acetate and aqueous extracts of leaves of <italic>A.indica</italic>showed the presence of phenols, tannins, flavonoids, carbohydrates, terpenoids, and alkaloids. Protein and amino acids were absent in all extracts of <italic>A. </italic><italic>indica</italic><italic>. </italic>Alkaloids are organic nitrogenous substances. These are alkaline in nature and exhibit an extra ordinary array of pharmacological activities. The flavonoids act as antioxidants which provide protection against free radicals that damage cells and tissues. Tannins promote healing of wounds. These are effective in diarrhea, colitis and peptic ulcers. High flavonoids content indicates the probability of significant antioxidant potential of the <italic>A. </italic><italic>indica</italic>leaves [20]. Here in the present study, found flavonoids in all different extracts of <italic>A. </italic><italic>indica</italic><italic>. </italic></p>
      <p>The antimicrobial activity of the aqueous, methanol, chloroform and ethyl acetate extracts of <italic>A. </italic><italic>indica</italic> was checked against the bacterial strains of<italic> S. </italic><italic>aureus</italic><italic>, </italic>and<italic> E. coli. </italic>In an earlier study, Khan <italic>et al.,</italic> 1987 reported that <italic>A. </italic><italic>indica</italic> leaves extract had a characteristic effect on dermatophytes especially for lower polar extracts over high polar ones. [21] Showed that <italic>A. </italic><italic>indica</italic>leaves extract was found to have interesting inhibitory action on a wider spectrum of microorganisms including <italic>C. </italic><italic>albicans</italic>, <italic>C. </italic><italic>tropicalis</italic><italic>, Neisseria gonorrhea</italic>, multi drug resistant <italic>S. </italic><italic>aureus</italic>, <italic>E. coli </italic>and <italic>Herpes </italic>simplex [22]. Showed the fungicidal and bactericidal properties of extracts from leave.Methanolic extract of A.indica leaves showed more antibacterial activity as compared to that of the chloroform, ethyl acetate and aqueous extracts. The zone of inhibition against <italic>S.aureus</italic> was 19.5 mm for methanol extract, 11.5 mm for ethyl acetate extract and of 13 mm for aqueous extract ,chloroform extracts showed no zone of inhibition against S.aureus. While in case <italic>of </italic><italic>E.coli</italic>bacteria the zone of inhibition of 18.5 mm was observed around the methanol extract,10 mm around the ethyl acetate extract and of 9 mm around the aqueous extract. Chloroform extract showed no zone of inhibition. The increasing order of antibacterial activity against <italic>S.aureus</italic><italic> – </italic>Ethyl acetate˂ aqueous extract˂ methanolic extract while in case of <italic>E.coli</italic><italic> – </italic>Aqueous extract˂ ethyl acetate˂ methanolic extract. Methanolic extracts showed more antioxidant activity as compared to other extracts of <italic>A. </italic><italic>indica</italic><italic>. </italic>also showed antioxidant activity of methanolic extract of leaves of<italic> A. </italic>indica[23]</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>
        <bold>CONCLUSION</bold>
      </title>
      <p>In the present project entitled <bold>“Comparative analysis of Phytochemicals, antibacterial and antioxidant activity of different extracts of </bold><bold><italic>Azadirachtaindica</italic></bold><bold>leaves</bold><bold><italic>”</italic></bold>we investigated various phytochemicals in different extracts of leaves. The result suggested that alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids were present in all the four extracts. Tannins were absent in the ethyl acetate extract and phenols were only present in the ethyl acetate extract. Sterols and phlobatannins were absent in all the four extracts. Saponins were only present in the aqueous extract and amino acids were only present in the ethyl acetate extract. The bacterial strains <italic> Staphylococcus </italic><italic>aureus</italic><italic> and  Escherichia coli </italic>were used against the different extracts of <italic>Azadirachtaindica</italic>  leaves <italic>i.e</italic>. methanol, chloroform, ethyl acetate and  aqueous. The investigation revealed that, methanol showed the maximum antimicrobial activity against<italic> Staphylococcus </italic><italic>aureus</italic> followed by <italic>E.coli</italic><italic>.</italic> Chloroform extract showed no antimicrobial activity against any bacterial strains. Therefore the results suggested that bioactive compounds found in leaves of <italic>Azadirachtaindica</italic>, contribute to its pharmacological activities. </p>
      <p>The DPPH free radical scavenging activity was performed to study the antioxidant potentials of <italic>A. </italic><italic>indica</italic> leaves. Methanolic extract of <italic>A. </italic><italic>indica</italic>   showed more antioxidant activity as compared to chloroform, ethylacetate and aqueous extracts. The result suggested the antimicrobial and antioxidant potential of <italic>A. </italic><italic>indica</italic>leaves.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-9">
      <title>
        <bold>REFERENCE</bold>
      </title>
      <list list-type="bullet">
        <list-item>
          <p>Shirish.S; Hepatoprotection study of leaves powder of <italic>A.</italic>indica A. juss. International Journal of pharmaceutical and science review and research. 2010, 32-45.</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Girish K. and Bhat SS;.Neem – A Green Treasure. <italic>Electronic Journal of Biology</italic>.,2008, 102-111.</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Biswas K, Chattopadhyay I, Banerjee R K, and Bandyopadhyay U; Biological activities and medicinal properties of neem<italic>(</italic><italic>Azadirachtaindica</italic><italic>). Current science. </italic>82, <italic>2002, </italic>1336–1345.</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Singh N and Sastry MS. Antimicrobial activity of neem oil. <italic>Indian journal </italic><italic>ofpharmacology</italic>. 1997, 102-106.</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Bandyopadhyay<italic>et</italic><italic>al</italic>.Clinical study of effect of neem bark extract on gastric secretion and gastroduodenal ulcer. <italic>Life sciences.</italic> 2004, 2867-2878.</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>DebjitBhowmik, Chirnajib, JitenderYadav, K.K. Tripathi,K.P. Sampath Kumar, Herbabal remedies of A.indica and its medicinal application,J .Chem. Pharm. Res., 2(1), 2010, 62-72.</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Zong A <italic>et al</italic>., Anticancer polysaccharides from natural resources: a review of recent research,” <italic>Carbohydrate polymers.</italic> 2012, 1345-1410.</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Govindachari T R , Suresh G , Gopalakrishnan G , Banumathy  B and Masilamani S;. “Identification of antifungal compounds from the seed oil of <italic>Azadirachtaindica</italic>,”  <italic>Phytoparasitica</italic>. 1998, 109–116.</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Kher A and Chaurasia SC; Antifungal activity of essential oil of three medicinal plants. <italic>Indian drugs. </italic>1997, 41-42.</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Ghimeray A.K, Jin C.W, Ghimire B.K, Che D H. Antioxidantactivity and quantitative estimation of <italic>Azadirachtin</italic>and Nimbin in <italic>Azadirachtaindica</italic>.<italic>AfricanJournal</italic><italic> of Biotechnology</italic>.  2009, 541684–5315.</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Arumugam A, Pomellaagullo, ThiyogarajanBoopalan,SushmitaNandy, Rebecca Lopez,Christina Gutierrez. Journal of cancer biology and therapy, 15, 2014.</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Okpanyi, S. N. and Ezeukwv G. C. Anti-inflammatory &amp;Antipyretic activities of Azadirachtaindica. <italic>Planta</italic><italic> Med</italic>., <bold>41</bold>, 1981, 34–39.</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Sen, P., Medinata, P. K. and Ray, A. Effects of Azadirachtaindica A Juss on some  biochemical, immunological and visceral parameters in normal and stressed rats. <italic>Indian J</italic>. <italic>Exp</italic>.<italic>Biol</italic>., 12, 1992, 1170–1175.</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Ray, A., Banerjee, B. D. and Sen, P. Modulation of humoral and cell-mediated immune responses by Azadirachtaindica (Neem) in mice.Indian J Exp Biol.  34(7), 1996, 698-701</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Murty, K. S., Rao, D. N., Rao, D. K. and Murty, L. B. G. A preliminary study on the hypoglycemic &amp;antihyperglycemic effects of Azadirachtaindica. <italic>Indian J</italic>. <italic>Pharmacol</italic>., <bold>10, </bold>1978, 247–250.</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>  El-Hawary, Z. M. and Kholief, T. S. Biochemical studies on hypoglycemic agents. Effect of Azadirachtaindica leaf extract. <italic>Arch</italic>. <italic>Pharmacol</italic><italic>. Res</italic>., <bold>13</bold>, 1990, 108–112.</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Garg, G. P., Nigam, S. K. and Ogle, C. W. gastric antiulcer effect of the leaves of the neem tree. <italic>Planta</italic><italic> Med</italic>., <bold>59</bold>, 1993, 215–217.</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Despande, V. Y., Mendulkar, K. N. and Sadre, N. L. Male antifertility activity of AzadirachtaIndica in mice.<italic>J</italic>. <italic>Postgrad.Med</italic>. (<italic>Bombay</italic>), <bold>26</bold>, 1980, 167–170.</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p> Khalid, S. A., Farouk, A., Geary, T. G. and Jensen, J. B. Potential antimalarial candidates from African plants: and in vitro approach using Plasmodium falciparum.J Ethnopharmacol.  15(2), 1986, 201-9.</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Pongtip S, Wandee G. Free radical scavenging activity and total flavonoid content of siameseneem tree leaf Aqueous extract from different locations. Mahidol University Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 32, 2005, 31-35 </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p> Khan M, Wassilew SW, Schmutterer H, Ascher KR. Natural Pesticides from the Neem Tree and Other Tropical Plants.Proceedings of 3rd International Neem Conference, Eschborn, Germany. 1987, 460-466. </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Subapriya R, Nagini S;. Medicinal properties of neem leaves: a review. Current Medicinal    Chemistry: Anticancer Agents. 5: 2005, 149-160. </p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>
          <p>Singh PP, Junnarkar AY, Reddi GS, Singh KV. <italic>Azadirachtaindica</italic>neuro-ycho pharmacological and antimicrobial studies.Fitoterapia. 58, 1987, 233-238.</p>
        </list-item>
      </list>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back/>
</article>
