<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Studies on antimicrobial effects of chromolaenaodorata on pathogenic bacteria isolates</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group content-type="author">
        <contrib contrib-type="person">
          <name>
            <given-names>Mbata C. A</given-names>
          </name>
          <email>alfrose1@yahoo.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff-1">
        <institution>Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Rivers State University of Science and Technology, NkpoluOroworukwo, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria.</institution>
        <country>India</country>
      </aff>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2020-08-09">
          <day>09</day>
          <month>08</month>
          <year>2020</year>
        </date>
        <date data-type="published" iso-8601-date="2020-08-09">
          <day>09</day>
          <month>08</month>
          <year>2020</year>
        </date>
      </history>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <fig>
      <graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="jpeg" xlink:href="image1.jpeg"/>
    </fig>
    <p>
      <bold>www.ijamscr.com</bold>
    </p>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>Studies on antimicrobial effects of chromolaena odorata on pathogenic bacteria isolates</title>
      <sec id="sec-1_1">
        <title>Mbata C. A.<sup>1</sup>, Nyenke C. U.<sup>1</sup>, Obi-Thomas J. N.<sup>2</sup>,Isoma C. J.<sup> 1</sup>, Adewoye M. O.<sup>1</sup></title>
        <p>
          <italic>
            <sup>1</sup>
          </italic>
          <italic>Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Rivers State University of Science and Technology, </italic>
          <italic>Nkpolu</italic>
          <italic>Oroworukwo</italic>
          <italic>, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria.</italic>
        </p>
        <p>
          <italic>
            <sup>2</sup>
          </italic>
          <italic>Department of Microbiology, University of Port Harcourt, </italic>
          <italic>Choba</italic>
          <italic>, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria.</italic>
        </p>
        <p><bold>*Corresponding Author</bold>: <bold>Mbata</bold><bold> C. A</bold></p>
        <p>
          <bold>Email id: </bold>
          <bold>alfrose1@yahoo.com</bold>
        </p>
        <sec id="sec-1_1_1">
          <title>ABSTRACT</title>
          <p>The study was conducted to investigate the antimicrobial effects of <italic>Chromolaena</italic><italic>odorata</italic> <italic>leaf</italic> on some pathogenic bacteria isolates that infect humans. The bacteria isolates include: <italic>Staphylococcus </italic><italic>aureus</italic><italic>, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas </italic><italic>aeruginosa</italic><italic> and Proteus species. </italic>The disc diffusion method was employed to determine the inhibitory effects of the leaf extract on the tests organisms. Aqueous and ethanol extract of the leaf were used at concentration of 80g/250ml and also diluted at concentration of 1:10, 1:100, 1:1000 and 1:10000. They were impregnated into a sterile filter paper disc. Ethanol alone was also impregnated into the sterile filter paper disc and used as control. The zones of inhibition for ethanol extract (80g/250ml) of the leaf on the selected clinical isolates showed zones of inhibition of 15mm for <italic>Staphylococcus </italic><italic>aureus</italic>, 12mm for <italic>Escherichia coli,</italic> 15mm for <italic>Pseudomonas </italic><italic>aeruginosa</italic> and 15mm for <italic>Proteus Specie</italic>. The Zone of inhibition obtained for diluted ethanol extract (80g/250ml) of the leaf at 1:10 showed <italic>Staphylococcus </italic><italic>aureus</italic> 12mm, <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> 11mm <italic>Pseudomonas </italic><italic>aeruginosa</italic> 12mm and <italic>Proteus Spp.</italic> 8mm. With Ethanol alone the inhibition rate varied form 0.4mm – 0.8mm, and an out rightly resistant at 1:1000 and 1:10000 with only 1:100 showing inhibition of 0.5mm for <italic>Proteus</italic> alone.</p>
          <p>There was outright resistant by all organisms with the aqueous extract of the leaf. From the investigation carried out it can be seen that <italic>Chromolaena</italic><italic>odorata</italic> <italic>leaf</italic> is a potential antimicrobial agent and effective only when used in organic solvent at a higher concentration. Ethanol alone has shown insignificant sensitivity for the organisms under investigation.</p>
          <p>Keywords: Chromolaena odorata, Awolowo, Inhibition, Solvent, Antimicrobial.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-1_1_2"/>
        <sec id="sec-1_1_3"/>
        <sec id="sec-1_1_4">
          <title>INTRODUCTION</title>
          <p><italic>Chromolaena</italic><italic>odorata</italic> (Siam weed) is a fast-growing perennial and invasive weed native to South and Central America. It is a known Toxic weed that is widespread in many parts of the world, including Nigeria. It is a specie from the <italic>family </italic><bold><italic>Asteraceae</italic></bold><bold>.</bold> The weed goes by many common names such as devil weed, communist weed, hagonoy, Awolowo leaf etc. Away from its native range, <italic>Chromolaena</italic><italic>odorata</italic> is an important weed in tropical areas extending from west central and Southern Africa to India, Sri lanka, Bangladesh, Cambodia, China, Taiwan and Indonesia (Bani, 2002., Umukoro and Ashorobi, 2006 and Hung <italic>et </italic><italic>al., </italic>2011) [3, 10]. <italic>Chromolaena</italic><italic>odorata</italic> is an aggressive competitor that occupies different types of lands where it forms dense strands that prevent the establishment of other flora. It is a menace in plantations and other ecosystems. It suppresses young plantations, agricultural crops and smothers vegetation as it possesses allelopathic potentialities and growth inhibitors (Ambica and Jayachandra, 2003) [1]. The economic value of <italic>Chromolaena</italic><italic>odorata</italic> is low.</p>
          <p>However, <italic>Chromolaena</italic><italic>odorata</italic> is a perennial shrub and it has become a serious pest in the humid tropics of South East Asia, African and pacific Islands. It spreads rapidly in lands used for forestry, pasture and plantation crops such as rubber, coffees, coconut, cocoa and cashew. The plant can be poisonous to livestock as it has exceptionally high level of nitrate in the leaves and young shoots; the cattle feeding on these die of tissue anoxia (Sajise <italic>et al;</italic> 2005) [2].</p>
          <p>The plant of <italic>Chromolaena</italic><italic>odorata</italic> is hairy and glandular and the leaves give off a pungent, aromatic odour when crushed (Lalith, 2009). The seed of the plant regenerate from the roots and under favourable conditions the plant can grow more than 3cm a day (Lalith, 2009) [7].</p>
          <p><italic>Chromolaena</italic><italic>odorata</italic> is sometimes grown as a medicinal and ornamental plant. It is used as a traditional medicine in Indonesia. The young leaves are crushed, and the resulting liquid used to treat skin wounds (Iwu, 2000) [6]. It is also used as anti-diarrhea, anti-plasmotic, anti-hypertensive, anti-inflammatory, diuretic tonic, anti-pyretic and heart tonic (Vital and Windell, 2009) [11]. In some Countries the fresh leave extract are use for treatment of burns, soft tissue wounds and skin infections. (Ayyanaf and Ignacinuthu 2009) [5]. In Southern parts of Nigeria, the leaves are used for wound dressing, skin infection and to stop bleeding as an anticoagulant. The Juice of the crushed leaves is applied to cuts to arrest bleeding: According to Iwu (2000) [6]. The macerated leaves are usually applied to swollen part of the body to relieve inflammation amongst the rural population in Southern parts of Nigeria.</p>
          <p>The Micro-organisms under investigation against Chromolaena odorata namely, <italic>Staphylococcus </italic><italic>aureus</italic><italic>, </italic><italic>Esherichia</italic><italic> coli </italic><italic>Pseudomonal</italic><italic>aeruginosa</italic><italic> and Proteus </italic><italic>Spp</italic> are potential human pathogens. These organisms exist in nature and have posed serious threat to man. The aim of the study is to determine the antimicrobial activity of <italic>Chromolaena</italic><italic>odorata</italic><italic> leaf</italic> on common pathogenic bacteria that exist in nature.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-1_1_5">
          <title>MATERIALS AND METHODS</title>
          <sec id="sec-1_1_5_1">
            <title>Study Area</title>
            <p>The study was carried out in the Diagnostic Laboratory of Braithwaite Memorial Hospital Port Harcourt.</p>
          </sec>
          <sec id="sec-1_1_5_2">
            <title>Plant Collection</title>
            <p>The leaves of <italic>Chromolaena</italic><italic>odorata</italic> were collected from Rivers State University Farm. The leaves were cleansed and dried in hot air oven at 100<sup>0</sup>c for 2 weeks. The leaves were ground into fine particles with mortar and pestle. About 80gram of the grinded powder was dispensed into 250ml of 70% ethanol and allowed to ripen for 7 days at room temperate. Also 80g of the grinded powder was dispensed into 250ml of water and allowed to stand.</p>
          </sec>
          <sec id="sec-1_1_5_3">
            <title>Test Organisms</title>
            <p>Bacterial Isolates obtained from clinical samples such as urine, wound swabs, high vagina swab and stool samples were obtained and identified by Grams and Biochemical methods and stored on nutrient agar plants of 4<sup>0</sup>C before use.</p>
          </sec>
          <sec id="sec-1_1_5_4">
            <title>Preparation of antibiotic disc</title>
            <p>Whatman filter paper was punched into circular shapes using a perforator and placed in a bijou bottle and sterilized at 121<sup>0</sup>C for 15 minutes.</p>
          </sec>
          <sec id="sec-1_1_5_5">
            <title>Dilution of extract</title>
            <p>Nine milliliters (9mls) of ethanol and distilled water were delivered to 8 tests tubes in a row, 4 each for ethanol and water. Serial dilutions were made from the stock by transferring 1ml from 80g/250ml tube and mixed thoroughly and transferred to the next tube in the concentrations of 1:10, 1:100, 1:1000 and 1:10,000. About 0.01ml of the diluted aqueous and ethanol extract were placed on the Punched disc.</p>
            <p>Thereafter well dried nutrient agar plates were seeded by streaking the required organisms separately throughout the entire surface of the plate. This was followed by transferring the <italic>Chromolaena</italic><italic>odorata</italic> impregnated disc onto the surface of the inoculated nutrient agar plates with the aid of a flamed forceps. Also an ethanol inoculated disc was also placed on the streaked plate that contains the test organism as control.</p>
            <p>Finally the inoculated plates with the disc were incubated at 37<sup>0</sup>C. After 24 hours, plates showing clear zones of inhibition were noted and the diameter measured.</p>
          </sec>
          <sec id="sec-1_1_5_6">
            <title>Statistical Analysis</title>
            <p>Data generated was analyzed using the SPSS 11 statistical software and the Chi-Square Method. Data was expressed as percentages. A p-value of ≤ was considered statistically significant.</p>
          </sec>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-1_1_6">
          <title>RESULT</title>
          <p>The study revealed anti-microbial activities of <italic>Chromolaena</italic><italic>odorata</italic><italic>.</italic> The inhibitory effect of the ethanol stock (80g/250ml) grounded extract of the leaf on the test organisms showed <italic>Staphylococcus </italic><italic>aureus</italic><italic> 15mm, Escherichia coli 10mm, </italic><italic>Psendomona</italic><italic>aeruginosa</italic><italic> 15mm and Proteus sp. 15mm.</italic> The aqueous stock of leaf showed to inhibitory effect against all the organisms. Ethanol alone showed minimal (insignificant) inhibitory effect of 0.4 – 0.8mm as shown in table 1.</p>
          <p>
            <bold>Table 1: Comparative antimicrobial sensitivity of extracts of leaf of </bold>
            <bold>Chromolaena</bold>
            <bold>odorata</bold>
            <bold>.</bold>
          </p>
          <table-wrap>
            <table>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Test Organism</bold>
                </td>
                <td colspan="3">
                  <bold>Zone of Inhibition (mm)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td/>
                <td>Ethanol Extract (Stock)</td>
                <td>Diluted Ethanol Extract</td>
                <td>Ethanol Aqueous Extract</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Staphylococcus </italic>
                  <italic>aureus</italic>
                </td>
                <td>15</td>
                <td>12</td>
                <td>0.8</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>
                </td>
                <td>12</td>
                <td>11</td>
                <td>0.5</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Pseudomonas </italic>
                  <italic>aeruginosa</italic>
                </td>
                <td>15</td>
                <td>12</td>
                <td>0.5</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Proteus sp.</italic>
                </td>
                <td>15</td>
                <td>8</td>
                <td>0.4</td>
              </tr>
            </table>
          </table-wrap>
          <p>Diluted Ethanol extract showed Zones of Inhibition at 1:10 with <italic>Staphylococcus </italic><italic>aureus</italic> showing 12mm, <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> 11mm, <italic>Pseudomonas </italic><italic>aeruginosa</italic> 12mm and <italic>Proteus </italic><italic>Species</italic> 8mm. At 1:100 dilution only <italic>Proteus Species</italic> showed inhibition of 0.5mm while others showed no zone of inhibition as showed in table 2 and figure 1.</p>
          <p>
            <bold>Table 2: Zone of Inh</bold>
            <bold>ibition in relation to dilution</bold>
          </p>
          <table-wrap>
            <table>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Test Organisms</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Neat 1:10(mm)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>1:100(mm)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>1:1000(mm)</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>1:10,000(mm)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Staphylococcus </italic>
                  <italic>aureus</italic>
                </td>
                <td>15</td>
                <td>12</td>
                <td>Resistant</td>
                <td>Resistant</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>
                </td>
                <td>12</td>
                <td>11</td>
                <td>Resistant</td>
                <td>Resistant</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Pseudomonas </italic>
                  <italic>aeruginosa</italic>
                </td>
                <td>15</td>
                <td>12</td>
                <td>Resistant</td>
                <td>Resistant</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <italic>Proteus Specie</italic>
                </td>
                <td>15</td>
                <td>8</td>
                <td>0.5</td>
                <td>Resistant</td>
              </tr>
            </table>
          </table-wrap>
          <p>
            <bold>Figure 1: Zone of Inhibition in relation to dilution</bold>
          </p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-1_1_7"/>
        <sec id="sec-1_1_8">
          <title>DISCUSSION</title>
          <p>The study has revealed that <italic>Chromolaena</italic><italic>odorata</italic> has anti-microbial action on Pathogenic clinical isolates. The inhibitory effect of the stock (80g/250ml) in ethanol grounded extract of <italic>Chromolaena</italic><italic>odorata</italic><italic> leaf</italic> on the entire organisms showed that <italic>Staphylococcus </italic><italic>aureus</italic><italic>, Pseudomonas </italic><italic>aeruginosa</italic><italic>, Escherichia</italic> <italic>coli</italic> and <italic>Proteus</italic> all exhibited high level of susceptibility with inhibitory zones ranging from 12 -15mm. The susceptibility of these organisms to the extract explains their use in the native medicine for the treatment of infections especially wound. This suggests that the extract of the plant is broad spectrum in nature. This of course correlates with the previous studies that the plant contains substances that are antimicrobial (Olukoya <italic>et al.,</italic> 1986) Aqueous extract of <italic>Chromolaena</italic><italic>odorata</italic> showed weak activity against test organisms. This may be as a result of loss of the plants active principle when drying or the inability of the solvent to dissolve some of the active principle of the plant (Ellof, 1998). Ethanol alone showed no inhibition this has shown that it is not a good antimicrobial agent.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-1_1_9"/>
        <sec id="sec-1_1_10">
          <title>Conclusion</title>
          <p><italic>Chromolaena</italic><italic>odorata</italic> has the potential of a good antibiotic on common bacterial isolates that cause infection to man. This has come to put to bear that antibiotics can be produced from the extract which could be beneficial to man consequently; pharmaceutical companies should avail themselves of this study and incorporate the leaf in most of the antimicrobial agents in use.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-1_1_11">
          <title>REFERENCES</title>
          <list list-type="bullet">
            <list-item>
              <p>Ambica, S. K and Jayachandra. Suppression of Plantations crops by Eupatrium weed. <italic>Curriculum Sciences</italic>, 49, 2002, 874 – 879.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>Ayyanar, M. and Ignacimuthu S. Herbal Medicines for wound healing among tribal people in Southern India. Ethno botanical and scientific evidences. <italic>International Journal of Applied Research in Natural Products,</italic> 2(3), 2009, 29 – 42.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>Bani, G. Status and Management of Chromolaena odorata in Congo, proceeding of the fifth international workshop on Biological Control and Management of <italic>Chromolaena</italic><italic>odorata</italic>2002<italic>.</italic></p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>Ellof, J. N. Which extract should be used for the screening and Isolation of antimicrobial components from plants Journal of Ethro Pharmacology, 60, 1998, 1-5</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>Hung, T. M., Cuong, T. D., Dang, N. H., Zhu, S. Long, P. Q. J. Komatsu, K and Mn, B.S. Flavonoid glycosides from <italic>Chromolaena</italic><italic>odorata</italic><italic> leaves</italic> <italic>and their </italic><italic>invitro</italic><italic>cytototic</italic><italic> activities.</italic> Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 59(1), 2011, 129 – 131.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>Iwu, M. M. Handbook of African Medicinal Plants, Beca Raton: CRC Press Incorporated 2000.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>Lalith, G. Invasive plants In: A guide to the identification of the most invasive plants of Sri lanks. Colombo: print House 2009.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>Olukoya, D., K; Odugbemi, T. O and Bamgbose, S. O. Some aspects of traditional therapy of gonorrhea in Lagos, Nigeria. <italic>Journal of Research in </italic><italic>Ethnomedicine</italic><italic>, 1, </italic>1986, <italic>26 – 29.</italic></p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>Sajise, P. E, Palis, R. K. Norcio, N. V and Lales, J. S. The Biology of <italic>Chromolaena</italic><italic>odorata</italic><italic> flowering behavior pattern of growth and nitrate </italic><italic>metaboliam</italic>. Philadelphia <italic>Weed Science</italic>, 1, 2005, 1 – 8.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>Umukoro, S and Ashorobi, R. Evaluation of the anti-inflammatory and membrane stabilizing effects of Eupatorium odoratum. <italic>International Journal of Pharmacology</italic> 2(5), 2006, 509 – 512.</p>
            </list-item>
            <list-item>
              <p>Vital, P. G, and Windell, L.R. Antimicrobial activity and Cylotoxicity of Chromolaena odorata. <italic>Journal of Medicinal plants research</italic> 3(7), 2009, 511 – 518.</p>
            </list-item>
          </list>
        </sec>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back/>
</article>
